• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Holiday Shipping Schedule!

    IH-1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo

    Bottoms
    200
    918
    287.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • m4ximeM
      m4xime
      Raw and Unwashed
      @pdee
      Joined:

      @pdee Legend thank you. Slightly less wide than the calculations then

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • catdad1C
        catdad1
        Raw and Unwashed
        @catdad1
        Joined:

        said in IH-1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo:

        @m4xime 888 hem came in about .5" smaller to the 1955 at 31" inseam for me. These are both OD but the standard indigos should translate. Also 888 overlayed on top of 1955 to see the difference.
        20250921_114629.jpg
        20250921_114551.jpg
        20250921_114759.jpg

        @worn2fade I found the 1955 to have a good bit more room through the leg compared to the 888 in the same size. Switch the topic here from the new cut to not divert, but I'm excited to see how roomy that one will be. I'll be in 1955s full time til the new relaxed cut once my 888s have a few more miles on them.

        edit: last photo - 888 on top of 1955

        last edited by catdad1 worn2fadeW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • worn2fadeW
          worn2fade
          Raw and Unwashed
          @catdad1
          Joined:

          @catdad1 thanks for that dude. To me though it’s not enough of a change. I love that 9” leg opening on the 634’s, that’s what I would need out of these.

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • m4ximeM
            m4xime
            Raw and Unwashed
            Joined:

            Stupid question potentially but is there a reason behind the fact that the 1955 doesn't have as much of an intricate patch design vs the other cuts like 888, 634, 666 etc? Read the info about the 684 patch which made me wonder.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • GilesG
              Giles
              IHUK Crew
              Joined:

              The 1955 is basically my take on the Levi's 1955 cut. So the cut is effectively not ours (and as an aside, therefore Haraki hates it 🙂 ) I thought I would keep it simple and just say what it is....

              The 555, 666, 777 and 888 were also initiated by me (but given to Haraki to Iron Heartify, so he loves them 🙂 ), for those, I came up with a Lot Number and then grew a story and imagery around that lot number....

              "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

              last edited by Giles 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 12
              • C
                CuseMM
                Raw and Unwashed
                Joined:

                What the difference in fit between the 634 and 1955?

                last edited by S AlexA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sabergirl
                  見習いボス
                  @CuseMM
                  Joined:

                  @CuseMM 1955 is like a 634s with a higher rise and narrower leg opening, fuller through the knee. Pretty similar to 888 with like an inch more rise.

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AlexA
                    Alex
                    IHUK Crew
                    @CuseMM
                    Joined:

                    @CuseMM https://ironheart.co.uk/pages/cut-comparison

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      CuseMM
                      Raw and Unwashed
                      Joined:

                      Thanks all. So I love my 634s but could use more front rise (sometimes feels like low rise jeans) and a bit narrower leg opening. Do I go 888 or 1955?

                      last edited by A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        asmith6120
                        @CuseMM
                        Joined:

                        @CuseMM below the knee the 1955 will keep a stronger leg impression than the 888. If you are fitting either of these to your natural waist you should have enough room with your front and back rise but the 1955 will wear slightly more comfortable, at least for me.

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Y
                          yannis
                          Haraki san Expert
                          Joined:

                          If you love the 634 and want a tighter hem 1955 is the option.

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright Iron Heart 2025.