• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    New Cut - Iron Heart Germany Exclusive - IH-684S-16-GER

    IH-1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo

    Bottoms
    198
    912
    284.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GilesG
      Giles
      IHUK Crew
      Joined:

      https://forum.ironheart.co.uk/topic/5662/if-i-want-to-end-up-with-an-inseam-of-x-what-will-the-hem-be

      "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

      last edited by FlavourFadeF m4ximeM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • FlavourFadeF
        FlavourFade
        Raw and Unwashed
        @Giles
        Joined:

        @Giles this is crazy. It does make sense that there's a way to calculate this specific measurement but still it's very thoughtful to share this with the community because it's something you think about before hemming your denim...

        Insta: free_the_fades

        wtb:
        The Pale Rider XXL

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • m4ximeM
          m4xime
          Raw and Unwashed
          @Giles
          Joined:

          @Giles Thank you super helpful. So I think if my calculations are correct I'd end up with a hem of 8.69" at 27" on a pair of 32s which would be perfect.

          Must say I was scratching my head running through the calculations and doing them on my phone 😂

          WTB - IHSH-408 Small

          last edited by M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • M
            moskiitto
            Raw and Unwashed
            @m4xime
            Joined:

            @m4xime Got the same result for you

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • P
              pdee
              Raw and Unwashed
              @m4xime
              Joined:

              @m4xime apologies for the delay

              IMG_3508.jpeg

              last edited by pdee m4ximeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • m4ximeM
                m4xime
                Raw and Unwashed
                @pdee
                Joined:

                @pdee Legend thank you. Slightly less wide than the calculations then

                WTB - IHSH-408 Small

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • catdad1C
                  catdad1
                  Raw and Unwashed
                  @catdad1
                  Joined:

                  said in IH-1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo:

                  @m4xime 888 hem came in about .5" smaller to the 1955 at 31" inseam for me. These are both OD but the standard indigos should translate. Also 888 overlayed on top of 1955 to see the difference.
                  20250921_114629.jpg
                  20250921_114551.jpg
                  20250921_114759.jpg

                  @worn2fade I found the 1955 to have a good bit more room through the leg compared to the 888 in the same size. Switch the topic here from the new cut to not divert, but I'm excited to see how roomy that one will be. I'll be in 1955s full time til the new relaxed cut once my 888s have a few more miles on them.

                  edit: last photo - 888 on top of 1955

                  last edited by catdad1 worn2fadeW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • worn2fadeW
                    worn2fade
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    @catdad1
                    Joined:

                    @catdad1 thanks for that dude. To me though it’s not enough of a change. I love that 9” leg opening on the 634’s, that’s what I would need out of these.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • m4ximeM
                      m4xime
                      Raw and Unwashed
                      Joined:

                      Stupid question potentially but is there a reason behind the fact that the 1955 doesn't have as much of an intricate patch design vs the other cuts like 888, 634, 666 etc? Read the info about the 684 patch which made me wonder.

                      WTB - IHSH-408 Small

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • GilesG
                        Giles
                        IHUK Crew
                        Joined:

                        The 1955 is basically my take on the Levi's 1955 cut. So the cut is effectively not ours (and as an aside, therefore Haraki hates it 🙂 ) I thought I would keep it simple and just say what it is....

                        The 555, 666, 777 and 888 were also initiated by me (but given to Haraki to Iron Heartify, so he loves them 🙂 ), for those, I came up with a Lot Number and then grew a story and imagery around that lot number....

                        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                        last edited by Giles 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 9
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright Iron Heart 2025.