• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    What Are You Wearing Today - Theme Week!

    IH-1955S-142 - 14oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo

    Bottoms
    38
    90
    11.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • freepickinF
      freepickin
      Joined:

      Such a great cut, so stoked to see it pop up in different fabrics. Looking forward to eventual day when a black version of the 1955 cut drops, like a 21oz SBG or 14oz bb or even an overdyed.

      last edited by freepickin 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • freepickinF
        freepickin
        Joined:

        @Mister_Brue oh hell yeah, thank you!

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jens
          Haraki san Student
          Joined:

          1955 just rocks

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JohnM
            Raw and Unwashed
            Joined:

            Just received these. Very nice denim that feels heavier than 14oz.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • John1968-75J
              John1968-75
              Raw and Unwashed
              Joined:

              For those that missed out the 1955 14oz is still available at selfedge and also Corlection store has stock

              JC

              last edited by John1968-75 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • m4ximeM
                m4xime
                Raw and Unwashed
                Joined:

                @AdamC How are you finding wearing the 1955 after mostly being in 888s?

                last edited by AdamCA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AdamCA
                  AdamC
                  IHUK Crew
                  @m4xime
                  Joined:

                  @m4xime Absolutely loving them. I sized up in the waist as well so need to wear a belt but I absolutely love the comfort and how they flow. I thought I might struggle with the higher rise but I really like it

                  last edited by m4ximeM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • m4ximeM
                    m4xime
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    @AdamC
                    Joined:

                    @AdamC Good to hear, I'm holding until the next 21oz stock to focus on 888s at the moment. Looking forward to seeing the evo on yours!

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • drewfonseD
                      drewfonse
                      Raw and Unwashed
                      Joined:

                      Im seriously thinking about picking up a pair of these from self edge, online. The thing that is giving me pause is the sizing.

                      I have a number of 888 pairs, including the 142s. This fit generally does well for me, but I’ve always wished that the front rise on it was even higher. I’ve worn a size 30 but have recently bought a few pairs in 31 and find them a bit more comfortable for me.

                      I bought a 1955 21oz when they released in a size 30 and they were just a little too big for me in general. Part of it was the cut, part of it was that I might have been able to size down because they sit so high. I can tolerate a tighter waist in a high rise Jean.

                      For reference, I recently bought a STF The Flat Head 3004, similar cut to the 1955, which after shrinking has about a 12” rise and inch smaller waist than most of my other denim. And they are extremely comfortable.

                      Do you guys think I might be able to pull off a 29 in this? I know it’s an impossible to answer question, and I know that this material doesn’t stretch as much as the 21 oz flagship does. I may order but not have them hem so I can return if necessary.

                      For clarity, I’m considering sizing down to make some of the other dimensions beyond the waist just a tad smaller than what I experienced with the 1955 21oz. I realize the dimensions aren’t exactly the same.

                      Thanks!

                      last edited by drewfonse 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        JohnM
                        Raw and Unwashed
                        Joined:

                        ^ I have the 1955 in 21 and 14oz and they fit similarly. While the 21 has more than a little give/stretch, I'd say the 14 will also give with waist pressure. If the 21 is too big, than go size 29. If you're happy with the fit, then 30.

                        Most important, however, are the measurements -- trust those and ask your AD for what you need. Obvious, but true 😉

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          schraiber
                          Raw and Unwashed
                          Joined:

                          Wearing my pair for the first time today, it's my first experience with the 1955 cut and it's an absolutely exceptional cut. I love the high rise, as I have very short legs, and the slight taper is exactly what I want in a pair nowadays. I'll post some pics in a few days when I get a chance.

                          This will probably end up being my new cut, switching from 888. Hoping we see the ducks in this cut, as my 888D are my favorite pants I've ever owned, so I suspect that 1955D would actually cause me to die and ascend to heaven.

                          last edited by ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • ?
                            A Former User
                            @schraiber
                            Joined:
                            This post is deleted!
                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • S
                              schraiber
                              Raw and Unwashed
                              Joined:

                              Here's a fit with the my new pair!

                              PXL_20260124_225033848.jpg

                              Really loving that the taper doesn't start right at the hip, since it works better for the shape of my leg.

                              For anyone that cares, here's some measurements. I always wash before the first wear. These are tag 33, I'm 5'11'' and 170lbs.

                              Pre-wash: waist 16.75 inseam 30.5
                              Post-wash: waist 16.5 inseam 30.25
                              After 2 wears: waist 16.9 inseam 30.25

                              The little bit of stretch I'm seeing makes me think I probably could have gone for a 32 but they weren't in stock and I felt like a little bit of extra space is good since I like to tuck in.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                              • M
                                michael.rose0107
                                Raw and Unwashed
                                Joined:

                                Which fit is similar to 1955? (I’m leaning towards 888).

                                last edited by worn2fadeW Tago MagoT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • worn2fadeW
                                  worn2fade
                                  Raw and Unwashed
                                  @michael.rose0107
                                  Joined:

                                  @michael.rose0107 888 is the most similar. You can use IH’s “compare” tool on their website to see the difference.

                                  IG: @Worn2Fade
                                  IIY5: 888-XHS
                                  RRY4: 293-OD

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • Tago MagoT
                                    Tago Mago
                                    Mod Squad
                                    @michael.rose0107
                                    Joined:

                                    @michael.rose0107 you can find additional information here and here

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Y
                                      yannis
                                      Haraki san Expert
                                      Joined:

                                      @michael.rose0107. I don't think any cut is similar to 1955. You can find similarities in all cuts if you look for it. I mean the only thing remotely similar to the 888 is maybe the higher rise although the 1955 has higher front rise. From crotch to knee is more 634 and knee to hem more 633. So go figure.

                                      last edited by M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • M
                                        michael.rose0107
                                        Raw and Unwashed
                                        @yannis
                                        Joined:

                                        @yannis Yeah, thats what I thought. I’m wanting the indigo/black; however it’s currently not available in 1955.

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Y
                                          yannis
                                          Haraki san Expert
                                          Joined:

                                          @michael.rose0107 . Is the 1955 the only cut you get along with? I am assuming you looking at the 25oz ib denim that comes in every other cut but the 1955. If the high rise is not extremely important to you the 634 or the 888 will do you right. The 888 has more taper and smaller knee measurements and the 634 is a classic straight fit

                                          last edited by M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            michael.rose0107
                                            Raw and Unwashed
                                            @yannis
                                            Joined:

                                            @yannis My first pair was IH-634S, it feels snug in the thigh. Later I bought IH-634D and I sized up and it fits better however I think the canvas is giving it more structure. I decided to try 1955 and currently breaking it in.

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.