AI Chat/GPT Pictures and Usage

[Stringthing75]

@Giles This might have been mentioned elsewhere, and I don't wanna be "that guy" but should we not just impose a blanket ban on AI/ChatGPT pics unless it is with a huge "AI" watermark through it. or just ban it altogether.

The problem is people end up copying and pasting and/or sending pics to others and before you know it the original context (already shaky) is lost and people are making decisions based on nonsense or people saying "that looks sht" because it's a rather shoddily produced mockup of what something might or might not look like.
Or people just quickly scrolling through threads and see pics and think its shi and keep scrolling.

IMO product pics should be real, with no exceptions. No doubts, no queries, no caveats.

In the last week or so I've seen fake aging pics, fake snap pics, who knows what else.

No offence to any of the original posters, but its a slippery slope to not knowing what is and isn't real/mockup/meant to be funny etc etc.

I could be miles off it here, in which case no offence intended and carry on lol.

[goosehd]

@Stringthing75 not a bad thought! Thank you for bringing it up

[Giles]

That is a damn good idea. Let me discuss with Alex

[sabergirl]

I’d be all for this move!

I will say, I’m not sure there’s any mechanism beyond requesting people comply to recognize/prevent these types of images. They’re getting harder and harder to spot.

[Ikeaparty]

big agree here as well

[nixage]

There are quite a few ai image detectors. I'm sure you could integrate that into the forum.

[goosehd]

The topic has been forked/moved here for further discussion @Giles @Ikeaparty @nixage @sabergirl @Stringthing75

[Oaktavia]

Yeah, I agree with this too. AI does not have a purpose here on the forum, that should go without needing to be said.

[Jord]

Completely agree with what's already been said here, 10 years or so people would say "That's photoshopped!" now it's "that's AI!"

At least there was some level of skill/work when people used photoshop...

[don_pipone]

I feel addressed with the snaps. Sorry for that. I swapped the image in the respective thread for a watermarked one ️

[Oaktavia]

@don_pipone I think this is addressed moreso at fake AI evo pics and such.

[don_pipone]

@Oaktavia I understand but still no one knows where this image might end up. I agree with what @Stringthing75 said, I didn’t think about possible implications when I posted it. Even though it‘s probably not as bad as fake evo it still is fake and should be marked as such.

[Jord]

@Oaktavia @don_pipone I wont lie, I've asked ChatGPT to give me fake evo pics on jeans like "what would these look like in 6 months" just to see what it could do... I don't think they look real, and you can normally always tell. But it would be really lame for someone to post them and pretend it's their own evo, etc. It could even be a concern for fading comps

I imagine if @Oaktavia asked to evo his jeans, it would just show them disintegrating and turning to dust

[Tago Mago]

@Jord Hey ChatGPT, show me Oak-aged denim

[don_pipone]

@Jord it wouldn’t be lame, it would be hilarious

[don_pipone]

@Jord said in AI Chat/GPT Pictures and Usage:

I imagine if @Oaktavia asked to evo his jeans, it would just show them disintegrating and turning to dust

Now I‘m seriously curious what ChatGPT would make out of it