AI Chat/GPT Pictures and Usage

[goosehd]

The topic has been forked/moved here for further discussion @Giles @Ikeaparty @nixage @sabergirl @Stringthing75

[Oaktavia]

Yeah, I agree with this too. AI does not have a purpose here on the forum, that should go without needing to be said.

[Jord]

Completely agree with what's already been said here, 10 years or so people would say "That's photoshopped!" now it's "that's AI!"

At least there was some level of skill/work when people used photoshop...

[don_pipone]

I feel addressed with the snaps. Sorry for that. I swapped the image in the respective thread for a watermarked one ️

[Oaktavia]

@don_pipone I think this is addressed moreso at fake AI evo pics and such.

[don_pipone]

@Oaktavia I understand but still no one knows where this image might end up. I agree with what @Stringthing75 said, I didn’t think about possible implications when I posted it. Even though it‘s probably not as bad as fake evo it still is fake and should be marked as such.

[Jord]

@Oaktavia @don_pipone I wont lie, I've asked ChatGPT to give me fake evo pics on jeans like "what would these look like in 6 months" just to see what it could do... I don't think they look real, and you can normally always tell. But it would be really lame for someone to post them and pretend it's their own evo, etc. It could even be a concern for fading comps

I imagine if @Oaktavia asked to evo his jeans, it would just show them disintegrating and turning to dust

[Tago Mago]

@Jord Hey ChatGPT, show me Oak-aged denim

[don_pipone]

@Jord it wouldn’t be lame, it would be hilarious

[don_pipone]

@Jord said in AI Chat/GPT Pictures and Usage:

I imagine if @Oaktavia asked to evo his jeans, it would just show them disintegrating and turning to dust

Now I‘m seriously curious what ChatGPT would make out of it