• Home
  • Recent
  • Calendar
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Calendar
  • Register
  • Login
Iron Heart Forum
Iron Heart Forum

New Iron Heart Website - Live Now - Feedback and Bug Report Here Please!

Random questions to which you seek an answer

The Resource Centre
718
18.4k
6.1m
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K
    Karol
    啓蒙家
    Joined: 14 Nov 2022

    Why there are no hand warmer pockets in leather shirt lineup?

    Favorite:
    IH-888S-21 | IH-888-XHSib | IH-805 | IH-729-PUR | IH-555-XHS | IH-555S-25MB
    IHSH-339-SAX | IHSH-341-BLK | IHSH-293-OD | IHSH-362-BLK | IHSH-409-IB | IHSH-336-OD | IHSB-BIGBUCK-BLK
    IHV-44-BLK | IHV-02-BLK
    IHJ-75-BLK | IHJ-79-BLK | IHM-37-ODG

    last edited by 28 Dec 2024, 09:57 A 1 Reply Last reply 28 Dec 2024, 10:04 Reply Quote 1
    • A
      Alex
      IHUK Crew
      @Karol
      Joined: 28 Sept 2009

      @Karol I guess because they were designed to be Western Shirts

      last edited by 28 Dec 2024, 10:04 K 1 Reply Last reply 28 Dec 2024, 10:52 Reply Quote 1
      • K
        Karol
        啓蒙家
        @Alex
        Joined: 14 Nov 2022

        @Alex Thanks!! OK, it finally makes sense. I don’t know why but I always thought about them as the CPO type (as it is more of an overshirt).
        I just love how successfully you guys added the handwarmer pockets to most of the CPOs

        Favorite:
        IH-888S-21 | IH-888-XHSib | IH-805 | IH-729-PUR | IH-555-XHS | IH-555S-25MB
        IHSH-339-SAX | IHSH-341-BLK | IHSH-293-OD | IHSH-362-BLK | IHSH-409-IB | IHSH-336-OD | IHSB-BIGBUCK-BLK
        IHV-44-BLK | IHV-02-BLK
        IHJ-75-BLK | IHJ-79-BLK | IHM-37-ODG

        last edited by 28 Dec 2024, 10:52 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Mister_Brue
          Raw and Unwashed
          Joined: 31 May 2024
          This post is deleted!
          last edited by 29 Dec 2024, 23:41 A 1 Reply Last reply 30 Dec 2024, 07:56 Reply Quote 2
          • M
            Matt
            見習いボス
            Joined: 4 Oct 2011

            It is. Just a clerical error I’m sure.

            last edited by 30 Dec 2024, 00:17 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A
              AdamJ
              IHUK Crew
              @Mister_Brue
              Joined: 29 Jun 2017

              @Mister_Brue Good spot! I am working on the new Hall of Fades as we speak. It will be maintained/regularly updated better than the current version.

              Have sorted the above, thanks.

              The devil is in the detail..

              last edited by 30 Dec 2024, 07:56 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • M
                mrimpractical
                Raw and Unwashed
                Joined: 27 May 2024

                Anybody able to explain the difference between original 14oz and the 142 denim? I know the weft is double-twisted, but wondering how this affects the end product. Based on IG posts it seems that the Japanese market stuck with the original 14oz, curious why that might be.

                last edited by 30 Dec 2024, 22:33 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  Giles
                  IHUK Crew
                  Joined: 22 Sept 2009

                  They did not stick with the original, they decided to stay with the original nomenclature, even though the denim changed. Alex and I decided to append the 2, so it was a distinct product variant. The double twist gives heft but not weight and makes the denim softer...

                  "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                  last edited by 31 Dec 2024, 06:13 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • J
                    JohnM
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    Joined: 7 May 2014

                    888s vs. 1955s

                    The 888s has more taper from the knee down, but how do these cuts compare in the top block? I've heard the 1955s has a slightly higher rise, but am interested in understanding any other differences. Thanks, John

                    last edited by goosehd 1 Feb 2025, 17:24 2 Jan 2025, 17:22 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      goosehd
                      Mod Squad
                      Joined: 8 Apr 2016

                      @ShopatIronHeart

                      "I don't give a shit what anyone else is doing, we will do what is best for us and our customers" - Giles P. :)

                      last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 17:30 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        Bailey
                        IHUK Crew
                        Joined: 30 Mar 2022

                        @JohnM the 1955 and the 888 are very similar, the 1955's are slightly higher in the rise and wider in the leg.

                        Comparison of the main cuts found here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/cut-comparison

                        @bailey_ironheart

                        last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 19:17 A 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jan 2025, 19:37 Reply Quote 1
                        • A
                          Alex
                          IHUK Crew
                          @Bailey
                          Joined: 28 Sept 2009

                          @Bailey said in Random questions to which you seek an answer:

                          @JohnM the 1955 and the 888 are very similar, the 1955's are slightly higher in the rise and wider in the leg.

                          Comparison of the main cuts found here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/cut-comparison

                          You can also do comparisons on the website, see here:
                          https://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum//post/7686

                          I've done one for you, see here:
                          https://www.ironheart.co.uk/module/leofeature/productscompare?list=230,1478

                          Some tag sizes visible below:

                          Screenshot 2025-01-02 at 19.36.35.png

                          last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 19:37 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • J
                            JohnM
                            Raw and Unwashed
                            Joined: 7 May 2014

                            ^ Thanks Bailey and Alex. I was just comparing sizes 35 and 36 in these two cuts (though it applies to all sizes). The waist is quite a bit larger on the 1955s compared with the 888s -- more than 1" larger. Curious if you might know why this is. Based on the charts, one could easily size down in the 1955s compared to the 888s -- agree?

                            last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:06 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • I
                              IRONGARR
                              Raw and Unwashed
                              Joined: 30 Dec 2024

                              Ideas for what I could use for a new fade comp
                              Weights, denim types, item types ....any advice is welcome

                              last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:08 T 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jan 2025, 20:21 Reply Quote 0
                              • A
                                Alex
                                IHUK Crew
                                Joined: 28 Sept 2009

                                When comparing jeans, compare actual waist to actual waist as best you can. Our jeans vary run to run, due to human error, so sometimes the actual waist doesn’t match the tag size

                                last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:17 J 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jan 2025, 20:26 Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  Tago Mago
                                  Mod Squad
                                  @IRONGARR
                                  Joined: 16 Jan 2021

                                  @IRONGARR welcome to the forum. FYI I have moved your post to this thread.

                                  Take a look at the cut comparison to get an idea of the different core cuts:

                                  https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/cut-comparison

                                  Ideally, you want to measure a pair of denim that fits you well, as described here:

                                  https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/how-we-measure-bottoms

                                  As far as denim weight goes, the 21oz is a great place to start imo. Check out the Indigo Invitational threads from past years for additional ideas and inspiration:

                                  https://www.ironhearteu.com/forum/category/36/heavy-weight-contests-competitions

                                  last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:21 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • J
                                    JohnM
                                    Raw and Unwashed
                                    @Alex
                                    Joined: 7 May 2014

                                    @Alex Got it -- there is variation from run to run and you guys have been great at providing actual measurements -- appreciated.

                                    Would you attribute the chart waist differential between the 888s and 1955s mostly to this (run to run variation) or would you guess the 1955s's waist does tend to run larger than the 888s's? Just curious, no problem if there's no way to know.

                                    last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:26 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A
                                      Alex
                                      IHUK Crew
                                      Joined: 28 Sept 2009

                                      No, It is not by design. It will either be run to run variance or the fact that a sample was approved when its waist was not the correct size without that being noticed and it’s continued from there.

                                      last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:31 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • S
                                        Subprime
                                        Haraki san Student
                                        @JoshC
                                        Joined: 13 Sept 2022

                                        @JoshC I'd 100% buy a 21oz cap

                                        Look for what you notice, but no one else sees

                                        WTB: Pale Rider XL | IHSH-399-ORA XL | IHSH-189-BRN L | IH-814-IND 32

                                        last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 20:59 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • M
                                          ManiacLachy
                                          Haraki san Student
                                          Joined: 3 Dec 2024

                                          How should you size a trucker jacket to fit? How do you all feel it should fit, generally? Loose and baggy, or slim and fitted?

                                          I'm eyeing the IH-526-ODG and trying to work out my size. I feel a trucker should fit quite slim to the body, but with enough room to wear a layer like a flannel underneath. I don't have to button up over a layer often, it rarely gets that cold here - I'm so jealous of you all layered up in cold snowy conditions while I'm sweating in shorts and a t-shirt.

                                          I've got an old Jean Shop type III (un-modified) trucker, that's only just too small. It's OK open or with just a thin t-shirt, but if I wear a flannel or sweater as a layer and do the jacket up, it's like a sausage casing and pulling across the chest.

                                          The Jean Shop has a P2P of 22.25" and a shoulder of 19.5". I'm thinking the IH-526-ODG in XXXL is about right for me with a P2P of 22.7" and shoulder of 20.7". Would that give me that little extra room for layering and movement, but not get too loose? Would it still be too tight? I think the 4XL is too big in comparison, especially in the other measurements.

                                          Final thought, I just picked up the IHSH-372-BRN in XXL (my first IH piece), measured P2P of 23.25" and shoulder of 20", fit's pretty perfectly. How do you size your heavy flannels vs a Type III? Is it normal to go for a smaller P2P on the trucker than the flannel?

                                          last edited by 2 Jan 2025, 22:45 G T F 3 Replies Last reply 3 Jan 2025, 00:28 Reply Quote 0
                                          17913 out of 18390
                                          • First post
                                            17913/18390
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright Iron Heart 2022.