IH-634S-A - 21oz Selvedge Denim Straight Cut Jeans (20th Anniversary Edition)
-
I so want these based on the details but just don't think straight cuts are flattering on me.
-
I thought the same until I tried them on
-
@EdH:
I got an extra half inch out of the thigh measurement on my 21oz 888s
@EdH Interesting as I size by thigh measurement and use a belt. I also suffer from calf size issues - would you comment on the calves between 888 and 634 for the same tag size, please. I do have 888s, but now I am strongly considering 634s.
-
I so want these based on the details but just don't think straight cuts are flattering on me.
@Nkwkfld:
I thought the same until I tried them on
It's just a personal opinion, but I think straight cuts are the jam. For me, it's all in the cuff. I think they look fine uncuffed, but in my eyes, cuffs give em that classic look. I also feel they look best when cuffed to a length that lets em hang straight with no break. With that in mind, footwear comes into play a lot. I think they look best with boots.
Alright I'll quit yammering but viva straightlegs and I see no reason why you couldn't rock em @mclaincausey
-
straight cut vs slimmer cut also depends a lot on the shirt or top you're wearing. If it looks too big and loose on you, try a looser fitting tee and see where that gets ya. (assuming the size and fit of the jeans are correct)
-
Fit really is in the eye of the wearer. I have seen so many people of very similar build say of the same cut "best cut I've ever had", "just does not work for me", does not suit my build" etc etc. It's a personal thing, and what "the cut just does work for me" really means "I personally don't like me in it".
-
The 888 is a straight leg too isn’t it?
For me tapered leg feels like I’m dressing too young for my age.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
@Jeanmoreau Actually the 888 is a tapered cut… https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans
TAPERED
Any jean with 777 or 888 in the model number. The 777 cut is also referred to as a “slim tapered” jean cut, similar to the 666 cut but slightly more tapered. The 888 is a slim cut jean with a higher rise and more taper from the knee to the cuff, giving a very flattering, modern, slim silhouette. The 888 cut looks great on most body types and also women/girls. Other tapered pants include our slim tapered 721 model chinos and relaxed tapered cargo pants, the IHDR-502. -
My first pair was 634S and I’ve had other pants in the cut like the SII and the OG cords (though the old cords really were quite slim by “634” standards). I can definitely wear them, but they don’t look as good as other cuts on me to me or more importantly to my wife. I’m a hemmer but that’s not really the issue. It’s how they look and considerations like how they work with footwear. I’m not going for a Marlon Brando thing even if I admire that look on others.
I did compare a size down of these to my 777N and it was reasonably close though, higher rise and about an extra inch through the thighs, knees, and cuff.
The other struggle is that there are UHRs in stock
-
I think 888 is as tapered as it gets in the IH world right? Loose top block, pretty tight cuffs… IH’s “carrot cut”
I got the Pronto slubs and not sure those will work either. Maybe I should grab some Annys and warehouse them along with those
I’m often surprised how different cuts look worn on different bodies. I don’t think “wow those look super tapered” when I see 777 or 666 on most people, they just look slimmer to me.
Giles is right though, what you think looks and feels good is what works. I can wear any of these cuts but those factors will vary.
-
I dont think that IH makes a cut that fits the carrot description but i maybe wrong. The 888 is tapered for sure but the leg opening is not as narrow as alot of the other brands out there. I wear tag 38 and a 8.5 to 8.7 hem width is not terribly narrow. Thats one of the reasons i love IH. They do not entertain those ridiculous hem widths..i mean a tag 38 with 14 inch thigh and 7.2 inch hem. Thats a carrot.
-
The 888 is a straight leg too isn’t it?
For me tapered leg feels like I’m dressing too young for my age.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I often see some confusion between “regular” and “straight”, and “slim” and “tapered”. The assumption being that all tapered cuts are also slim, and all regular cuts are straight.
IH have a slim straight cut (666), and a regular tapered cut (888). Then there’s the 555 which many assume to be tapered but actually isn’t (it tapers sharply in the thigh but drops straight from knee to hem).
-
Fit really is in the eye of the wearer. I have seen so many people of very similar build say of the same cut "best cut I've ever had", "just does not work for me", does not suit my build" etc etc. It's a personal thing, and what "the cut just does work for me" really means "I personally don't like me in it".
This resonates for sure. In my early 30’s I heard that tapered legs work for shorter inseams as the give an impression of greater length (ahem). That made sense to me and having a short inseam for my height I bought into it. While it maybe true to a degree, it is an exaggeration to say it makes a meaningful difference.
So I started as a 555 guy (which was always bordering on too tight in the thigh and knee). At the same time I have always loved straight legged, loose cargo pants. Add to this the fact that I saw folks on here with my build, wearing straight cuts and looking boss, and I was getting confused. I’ve now tried every IH cut and the one thing I know for sure is, that I’m 6ft tall, bulky and still have a 31” inseam. I also know that any cut can work if you like the aesthetics. That includes what else you wear with it, on your feet, on your top half, how you style the whole thing etc. etc.
-
@EdH:
I got an extra half inch out of the thigh measurement on my 21oz 888s
@EdH Interesting as I size by thigh measurement and use a belt. I also suffer from calf size issues - would you comment on the calves between 888 and 634 for the same tag size, please. I do have 888s, but now I am strongly considering 634s.
I've never tried the 634 on - I'd have to size up once on the waist to hit my minimum thigh measurement… though that would probably hit just fine on the hips rather than at the waist...
My calves are not that bulky so I've got plenty of room down there on my 888s. But if you want to let me know how far down the inseam you'd like me to measure across I'll let you know how wide my 888s are at that point. I've hemmed to 31.5 inches on my 888s (in case you're really tall!), and they're a tag 34.
-
@EdH:
I got an extra half inch out of the thigh measurement on my 21oz 888s
@EdH Interesting as I size by thigh measurement and use a belt. I also suffer from calf size issues - would you comment on the calves between 888 and 634 for the same tag size, please. I do have 888s, but now I am strongly considering 634s.
Just check the difference between the knee and hem of both models on the tables. That will tell you the rate of taper so you can compare. The short answer is that there is much more room in the 634.
-
Neph93 is spot as always. For the same tag size the 634 has considerably more room from knee to hem and actually mid thigh also.
-
@EdH:
@EdH:
I got an extra half inch out of the thigh measurement on my 21oz 888s
@EdH Interesting as I size by thigh measurement and use a belt. I also suffer from calf size issues - would you comment on the calves between 888 and 634 for the same tag size, please. I do have 888s, but now I am strongly considering 634s.
I've never tried the 634 on - I'd have to size up once on the waist to hit my minimum thigh measurement… though that would probably hit just fine on the hips rather than at the waist...
My calves are not that bulky so I've got plenty of room down there on my 888s. But if you want to let me know how far down the inseam you'd like me to measure across I'll let you know how wide my 888s are at that point. I've hemmed to 31.5 inches on my 888s (in case you're really tall!), and they're a tag 34.
Same numbers for me. I do have 888, was looking for 634 in comparison. I will look at the listed numbers for knee and hem and extrapolate what it would be if they were hemmed to 31…
-
@EdH:
I got an extra half inch out of the thigh measurement on my 21oz 888s
@EdH Interesting as I size by thigh measurement and use a belt. I also suffer from calf size issues - would you comment on the calves between 888 and 634 for the same tag size, please. I do have 888s, but now I am strongly considering 634s.
Just check the difference between the knee and hem of both models on the tables. That will tell you the rate of taper so you can compare. The short answer is that there is much more room in the 634.
Yep, not straight forward though because for 21oz the inseam varies by about 1in between 634 and 888. furthermore, my actual inseam is 31. 888 is wider in the thigh, narrower in the calf. So I have to extrapolate a fair bit. Trying them on would be best. Or get measurements in 10cm steps from the crotch downwards…