IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters

[Daniel San]

@Matt
does your dealer have some 461s ?

[ROman]

Nein

[Giles]

I was going to answer for you, but thought it rude

[popvulture]

@Matt agreed. I was expecting them to be like 888s with a wider leg opening (my dream), but mine fit a good bit slimmer. Def between 666 and 634.

[Matt]

Yeah, it’s hard to compare to newer models because it’s so similar to those two which is why they went defunct. Sadly. They’re perfect for me. Although I have enough pairs now to last me for a bit so I really can’t complain.

[Matt]

@Giles said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

I was going to answer for you, but thought it rude

First someone outed aitoro store which Filthy turned me onto and now you guys are outing my dealers!?!?

I’m gonna have to go super dark on you guys to get my aura of mystery back.

[ROman]

@Matt

[ROman]

My description were that the Beatle busters were a BIT higher rise, and a BIT slimmer than the 634. I loved the 1955, but these ran a very close second in fit to me.

[Matt]

You guys watch…. I’ll get Banksy to start custom tagging my patches. I will figure it out.

[chrisjohnnick]

between a 666 and a 634. So, a 650?

[Matt]

Just about. Slightly higher rise.

[Chap]

@ROman said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

My description were that the Beatle busters were a BIT higher rise, and a BIT slimmer than the 634. I loved the 1955, but these ran a very close second in fit to me.

My only Busters are the 18oz raw but for them I can confirm that.

[Kasi]

Mine are 25oz can confirm that.

[hajduk]

Same here. My 25oz (Popeye’s patch) has a higher rise. Higher than mine BB 21oz actually.

[steelworker]

@ROman was that nein or nine?
Just-curious.

[steelworker]

[Kasi]

@hajduk said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

Same here. My 25oz (Popeye’s patch) has a higher rise. Higher than mine BB 21oz actually.

Same pair I have

[louisbosco]

now I want one

[ROman]

@steelworker said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

@ROman was that nein or nine?
Just-curious.

It was nein, to the 461's.

[Matt]

Although it would be less surprising if you had nine pairs squirreled away in the vault that you just forgot about.