Recent Purchases

tody

Pretty visionary to have a @ in the 50s

I had to look that up, too - but the history of that particular sign is a little broader than you'd expect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_sign

SKT

@Daniel-San @tody wow thats a lot of information on “@“ ! I like the document from 1345 that had it. Damn, the fact I knew what “@“ meant before the digital revolution is making me feel old.

mclaincausey

Where y@? Is common enough in my life that I am well-familiar with it. Pretty awesome that it dates back to the 14th century!

Matt

Something new (to me) is coming my way…

SKT

That hanger looks naked

Matt

Not for long homie.

tody

I need that 107 in my life...

Matt

It’s a gem for sure.

indigogera

I’m a sucker for a chambray shirt. Picked up this workshirt at a vintage market today. Not sure when they stopped putting the tag on the front but I like it. I own the western version and been eyeing this one for a bit now. Gently worn and a good price.

Matt

I believe that tag was sometime around the 10 yr forum anni but I could be wrong. Excellent score!

Matt

Or maybe the regular 10 year anni. They say memory is the 2nd thing to go.

Anesthetist

Around 2012/2013 i think

indigogera

@Matt eyesight might be up there in things to go. I completely missed reading 10th Anniversary on the tag. Haha

Giles

Read this:

5 mins later

As an aside, what an absolutely brilliant tag-line.....

tody

yup, that is good comparison. always wanted to try Kroil, as it supposedly has superior penetrating characteristics. bummer you can't get the aerosol cans in Europe. I use heat most of the time in the garage, though.

Giles

Yeah, heat not an option with lots of GRP about

Anesthetist

One of the artists I collect (Peter Manion) kindly gifted me with these two. I’m trying to decide whether to mount them together or frame seperately.

More of his pieces for reference:

SKT

@Anesthetist Very cool. And I like the pieces you already have.

Giles

I may be too simple for conundrums of this magnitude, But I would only separate them if "terrible:" was the last word of the first part. Then they can stand alone as two separate messages.....

sabergirl

I kind of like how disjointed it is if you separate. Like “I’m going to tell you a story of something. Really.”

Then comes “Terrible. But first let me get a drink and a smoke.”

If they’re next to each other it can be a unified story. Or not. Gives flexibility.

Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

Recent Purchases