Random questions to which you seek an answer
-
Canada goose seems to be the current thing on everyone in the U.K at the moment. I find it hard to believe that all these people are dropping that amount cash on a jacket. So leaves me to be believed they are being faked.
I dunno what your budget is but have you looked a Visvim valdez?
-
Have you looked at Uniqlo seamless down? They have seems, so not sure about the name. For the price they can’t be beat. My wife just got one and after my mom saw it, she got one as well. Not sure how long they will last, but so far so good.
-
If you are buying down, you really need to check the way the down is harvested from the ducks/geese…
Yeah, I did some research yesterday.
Apparently down collected from live geese/ducks is the best, but obviously there are ethical issues with plucking living animals…
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
-
Canada goose seems to be the current thing on everyone in the U.K at the moment. I find it hard to believe that all these people are dropping that amount cash on a jacket. So leaves me to be believed they are being faked.
London is full of cheap fake CG coats, I have zero sympathy for any damage it does to their brand .. absolutely appalling track record of animal cruelty, Peta have been after them for years..
-
Have you considered putting extinct collaborations in Extinct?
-
@EJS:
Canada goose seems to be the current thing on everyone in the U.K at the moment. I find it hard to believe that all these people are dropping that amount cash on a jacket. So leaves me to be believed they are being faked.
London is full of cheap fake CG coats, I have zero sympathy for any damage it does to their brand .. absolutely appalling track record of animal cruelty, Peta have been after them for years..
Agreed. The Regent Street store is constantly demo'd. CG is huge in Essex, and widely available in high street shops. Everyone driving an Audi seems to wear them. Think about the cost…how many people think nothing of paying out for a full sleeve tattoo. Not much difference. There are a lot of clueless but loaded people out there.
-
One for the crew and those with good knowledge of clothing history…
Why low rise cut jeans? I understand that some find them aesthetically pleasing, but as a Work wear item of clothing they are completely impractical and uncomfortable. I can't bend over without exposing 6 inches of naked flesh on my back, or sit down. Why????
-
@Stuart.T Wikipedia to the rescue! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-rise_pants
I particularly enjoyed learning about the unsuccessful 2004 attempt to ban low-rise jeans in Louisiana. I did a little digging–as this sounded kiiinda like BS--and sure enough, House Bill 1703 apparently had support from 39 and was opposed by 54. Supposedly it needed 53 to pass, so it really wasn't crazy close. Even more research revealed that the state legislator behind the bill (somewhat surprisingly to me, a democrat) was apparently sentenced in 2010 to 37 months in prison for conspiracy to commit money laundering. So maybe his real concern with low-rise jeans was the lack of hiding places for wads of ill-gotten cash.
It is, as they say, a funny old world.
-
Low rise are perfect for fixing leaky pipes under the sink.
-
@nurunuru thanks for that. Thankfully I tend to be sagging rather than whale-tailing.
It does still beg the question, why do Japanese and US heritage based denim/work wear brands persist in making jeans with rear rises lower than 16 inches? Just fashion and populist taste?
-
I believe rise height has varied historically a great deal. Even today’s so-called high rise models wouldn’t have been considered high a century ago. There’s also a huge difference between going for accurate re-production, and tipping your hat to older designs.
Just to give the issue even more nuance, jeans stopped being solely work wear around 1950, and jeans didn’t have meaningful taper or even slim iterations until after that. They’ve been subject to fashion and populist taste for a long, long time.
-
Does low rise have anything to do with the riding/seating position on a motorcycle?
Canada Goose is indeed now majority owned by Bain Capital. The grandson of founder still has a minority stake and running the show. You can see a lot university kids having CG as their everyday coat in Canada. The company's mandate now is to aggressively expand outside of North America. They are targeting Europe and Asia, particulary in South Korea and China. The floodgate has opened in China this year. They charge a high price because they think they can. They don't make everything in Canada anymore, some are outsourced.
-
My random question:
I bought a portable jump starter for my car and I’ve watched several videos on how to use one. However, I’ve seen two different ways to use the jumpstarter, I’m just not sure which is the correct way. Version 1: hook positive cable to positive on battery and negative cable to negative on battery. Version 2: hook positive cable to positive on battery and negative cable to a grounded piece of metal, like a lugnut.
So which is the correct way? When I got my car jumped a few days ago the guy used version 1. Does it even matter?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I've always used method #1, which was the way my dad taught me. I've only seen tow truck guys do it that way, too. Since it seems to work and I haven't died yet, I'll probably keep doing it that way.
-
The reason either works is that the negative node is typically grounded, so it doesn't make a difference as long as you follow the correct sequence: red dead, red live, black live, black dead (chassis or negative pole). Reverse that to disconnect. With a jump starter like yours, it's just red live, black live, turn on the jump starter, give it a crank. I had to do a lot of this recently when an old battery went out on me.
The reason they say not to connect to the negative pole and instead to a grounded part of the car is that there is an infinitesimal chance that a spark could blow you up and/or start a fire on the very slim chance that the battery is emitting hydrogen gas. I think this risk is probably even less likely with modern batteries, but I suppose if there is still a risk at all the safe play is to keep that negative cable farther away from the positive cable and the battery.
