Random Rants
-
I've said it before and ill say it again…
USPS is absolutely worthless. 9/10 times you can walk a package to its destination in less time. I CANNOT STAND THESE MONGRELS
-
Wow, so this isn't a rant but since D-666 mentioned Loveland and I mentioned the fatal avalanche I wanted to share this story my buddy told me the other night.
Right after those hiking boarders died in an avalanche this season at Loveland my buddies were supposed to be taped for a commercial there for Mitsubishi cars. Basically this producer that frequents the restaurant one of them works at saw him after he came in for his shift after a morning of ripping fresh and asked why he was glowing. He told her about his morning runs and she asked if he could send her some videos. She showed them to Mitsubishi and they wanted to use him. She asked if he had any friends to bring in for the shoot and he brought in another of our buddies. He had full creative control of the skiing aspects of the thing in terms of setting it up, and they were going to get a generous hourly rate, and could have kicked off a serious video portfolio with it. On top of all that, wound up snowing 19" day before the scheduled shoot. Would have been ideal to make a killer video for this commercial.
While it pales in comparison to the loss of those human lives, the opportunity vanished when they closed down Loveland after the avalanche.
-
So sad…
-
HOly crap! Havent sold on ebay for about a year and just got hit over the head with seller fees…... Apparently they take 10% of your buy it now price + an additional Paypal (alos known as eBay) ???? forget them... that is RIDICULOUS.
-
I had a similar eBay experience recently. I sold a mountain bike for a little over $2k and didn't expect the 10% percent hit. I knew about the PayPal fees and I knew I would be tagged with a fee from eBay, just not 10%!!! To add insult to injury the shipping fees ended up being more than anticipated. Should have kept the bike…
-
Went to SENY today planning on buying a pair of jeans, did not happen. Tried on the 666-XHS sz36, wow not even close to the original run's measurements. We measured them against the other pair of jeans I tried on, 9634 sz36. From the lower thigh down, exact same measurements. Those cuts are suppose to be totally different. The only difference in the cuts were that the 666xhs were way slimmer in the top block(too slim for my liking) where as the 9634 was overly baggy in the top block. I know I know, fit is very subjective but man I was super disappointed in these specific runs.
-
I'm after the 666XhS first run. The measurements on the current run are not the same. The Beatle buster is the opposite of what I want, they have a smaller waist and at least a 9.3in+ leg opening and that's at a 36inseam. By the time you hem them for my short ass you have 9.5-9.7in leg opening, which is enormous. I just don't think IH makes a cut anymore that can fit me how I want. If they made cuts in shorter inseams, like in Japan, they would fit me fine because the cut would be true but not on these 36in+ inseams. Any sort of taper there is gets lost once you hem them to 32ish or shorter.
Tons of other brands fit like fucking gloves, I just don't get it.
Btw, I tried on the original 666xhs run when they came out and they fit like a glove, just didn't have the cash. Also, tried on Zwer's pair, fit like a glove.
-
I'm sure they (IH) probably try to shoot for some kind of happy medium. It's like a game if tug-o-war. On one end you got tall guys like myself, seancono, twin, etc pulling for the longest inseams we can get because we legitimately need them and then there's the other side of the spectrum who loses the taper when they get hemmed if they are too long…I'm just happy that there are a few offerings, limited as they maybe, out there for us talk guys who wear boots cause I just can't do 7" leg openings.
-
Maybe the should consider an "R" size with a shorter inseam and a "T" designation for a longer one.
-
Maybe the should consider an "R" size with a shorter inseam and a "T" designation for a longer one.
I think that's a great idea. But that's a lot of extra work. There would probably need to be a whole new pattern made for the shorter(regular) inseams. I feel like they used to all be 34in inseams or smaller but changed to 36in for the western market. I don't think any pair of pants should have a knee measurement larger than 9in no matter the size. Anything over a 9in hem opening is too wide and falls under your heels.
-
The reality is as follows. We are just not large enough an entity to run different versions of the "same" item.
So with jeans, I have to go longer because it is always possible to shorten (even if that does compromise the cut) whereas if I go short, I can't add on.
Similar with T-shirts. No one shape fits all, so Haraki and I have to reach a compromise about what will suit the most people out of our combined customer base.
I understand that this means that not everything will work for everyone, but it was ever thus.
-
I'm sure they (IH) probably try to shoot for some kind of happy medium. It's like a game if tug-o-war. On one end you got tall guys like myself, seancono, twin, etc pulling for the longest inseams we can get because we legitimately need them and then there's the other side of the spectrum who loses the taper when they get hemmed if they are too long…I'm just happy that there are a few offerings, limited as they maybe, out there for us talk guys who wear boots cause I just can't do 7" leg openings.
OK, I have been ruminating. How about this for a plan?
As many future runs as possible of stuff that I can control, I make the leg opening to be par at 34" even if I make them 36 or 37 or whatever.
