We know you love IH, but where do you think we can improve?
-
I know bud. There's more of you fit bunch than us big big boys. At least more who are into fantastic IH clothing. I need to lose
-
A hip measurement (a la rivet & hide) for all currently available bottoms would be extremely helpful. One could get an idea of how tight or loose the entire topblock will feel.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I8190 mit Tapatalk
bump
-
^ no reason other than that’s the way Tom-san does it in Japan. That won’t be changing.
Precisely. When I spec a shirt I need my measurements to be done exactly as they do them in Japan otherwise I have to keep 2 measurements to hand which is a) more effort b) risky.
Nor will we be adding a hip measurement…In 10 years we've been asked for it 3 times. Plus the way we run the compare sizing option, we try and make sure that the same measurements are on the same line so that the compare is easy. If we add hip measurements to new products going forward, we screw that up, so the only alternative is to go back and measure every size/model and update all the measurement tables. 1) we do not have time 2) we do not have all the size/models of extinct items to compare.
And guess what? If you email us and ask for the hip measurements of a few pairs of jeans, we'll happily provide those.
-
I love the new 6.5oz. fabric of the IHT-1610 etc..
Have you ever thought about covering the seam of the neckline and shoulders?
Wearing a backpack feels a little bit uncomfortable.
As the fabric is very flexible and a cover is not possible, what about flat stitched seams? -
Front pocket seam taping on the 777's. This feature is on both my 666's but not my 777S-21's.
-
In the forum having sub-categories for the shirts/pants/jackets (i.e. denim shirts, flannels, etc. with all the specific products underneath their sub-categories).
This came to mind today when I was trying to find the thread for a specific UHF.
-
Not saying that we can't do this, but what's wrong with the search function?
I find the search function works rather poorly on Tapatalk, which is how I access the forum 99% of the time. When I use the website on any computer the search function works great. This might be a good enough reason for reorganizing categories, though I’m not too sure how many people use Tapatalk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Not saying that we can't do this, but what's wrong with the search function?
I find the search function works rather poorly on Tapatalk, which is how I access the forum 99% of the time. When I use the website on any computer the search function works great. This might be a good enough reason for reorganizing categories, though I’m not too sure how many people use Tapatalk.
If there was a IHF app which was just a more user friendly interface than Tapatalk would you use that or do you prefer tapatalk because it covers various forums you use?
Question to all Tapatalk users…
-
Tapatalk is terrible. If the IH forum weren't on there, I probably wouldn't use it at all. Having our own app would be great.
Word.
I’d suggest that even for those IHF users who use Tapashite for other forums, having an individual app for IHF would be considered a positive thing. The other alternative would be a version of the desktop forum that was more mobile friendly.
For my part, I dislike large format smart phones like the iPhone 8 Plus, but I found myself considering one recently as it may facilitate using the desktop version of the forum. That’s how frustrating Tapatalk is.
