Iron Heart Products - What do you think we should make?

[mclaincausey]

Anyone ever heathered a darker and a lighter indigo thread together on a knit fabric? That and/or a twist/plain chambray with different dips or dyes on the threads could be cool.

[sabergirl]

@Finkster:

and  Raglan Shirts!

This!

[Finkster]

A comeback of the IHTB-05 would be nice.

[scooter]

How about a ventile lined "first  zip" in chocolate brown whipcord ?

[Jett129]

Has there ever been an indigo/indigo CPO? If not,that might be a cool idea.

[Alex]

@Jett129:

Has there ever been an indigo/indigo CPO? If not,that might be a cool idea.

Tonal or contrast stitch?

[Jett129]

That’s a tough call. Put a gun to my head and I’d say contrast stitching,as I like how that looks when it fades.

[browniemcghee]

Just to be a pain, I have to point out that the contrast stitching on the 110 was too “contrasty” for many when it dropped.  If you don’t go tonal, I would suggest a less bright contrast than the 110.  They look great once they fade a little, but off the bat, I think the intense contrast weakened sales.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[UnTucked]

I remember mentioning a DD 189 would be awesome, but CPO would be just as well!

And definitely tonal

[Alex]

@browniemcghee:

They look great once they fade a little, but off the bat, I think the intense contrast weakened sales.

Agreed, that's why we are trialling the 555SII with tonal rather than contrast.

[Jett129]

I didn’t remember the 110,so went and took a look ,and definitely not as contrasting as that.

[David K.K. Hansen]

I might be in the minority, but I loved the look of the IHSH-110.  Though the measurements weren't in my favour, unfortunately.

[Max Power]

Cargo Pants 14-16 oz and with slightly smaller leg opening - Khaki, black and olive. Pleeaase.

[marlin]

@Max:

Cargo Pants 14-16 oz and with slightly smaller leg opening - Khaki, black and olive. Pleeaase.

So true…pleeaase!!!!

[Max Power]

And while we're at it - save some fabric for Shorts.

[Alex]

@Alex:

@Max:

@Alex That's too bad

I didn't say no, just that there are no current plans.

What I have said before, though, is that a rerun or a new cargo pant would have to be initiated by Japan. Our retailers do not buy cargo pants, and as much as we would love to help the 10 or so of you who have expressed an interest on here, we cannot risk a run of 60 pairs at IHUK alone.

[chech69]

New to this thread, haven't read all 500+ pages, and I'll bet this has been mentioned prior, but I'll chime in that I'd love for jacket inner pockets to be sewn completely shut, rather than having that small opening at the bottom…

Here's my Type III below a jacket (Kuhl) that's stitched up tight.

(I'd love to know if this has been suggested before, thx.)

[browniemcghee]

Very good suggestion.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Giles]

Then you would need a line of stitching that would show on the face of the jacket….If it's a big issue for you personally, you could pop in a few blind stitches....

[chech69]

@Giles:

Then you would need a line of stitching that would show on the face of the jacket….If it's a big issue for you personally, you could pop in a few blind stitches....

No, Giles, I want you to pop in a few blind stitches…

Kidding.  Thanks, Giles, I hadn't considered the show on the A side... Is this the reason why this isn't done?