IHSH-409-IB - 19oz Selvedge Denim CPO Shirt - Indigo/Black
-
@GeorgieL
Hey.
I am 5.7 (171cm) and 145lb (66 kg)
I have the CPO Overdyed IB already, and that is fitted and quite tight under the pits as well, but not as ”bad” as this, so I thought maybe this one just has to be soften up by wear.
I really want to keep this one but perhaps I should put my money on something that I can wear without hesitation. -
Think I saw these in stock at self edge Sunday. I was locked in/focused on pant selection. Picked up some chinos and pair of 633 21oz SBGs. Everyone’s pics got me FOMOing, and got the “denim itch” right now lol. I still have the SEXIH25-CPOOD waiting to break out(wore like half a day), but one can never have to many CPOs. May stop in tomorrow and check out if was in stock and my size still there.
-
@Adero did you see 140 is getting restocked. Same fabric but grey instead of black weft.
-
@moskiitto
oh dear....just when I thought I was out.....
No I didn't see that, but I have now.
lol -
@meatmarketdenim1 are you sure that Selfedge is stocking this CPO? I believe the stock list was updated and Selfedge did not stock them. There is nothing online either. Maybe I am remembering wrong and the stock list is incomplete. Either way, nothing a simple call to them could answer.
-
Sleeves are a whole inch or so longer than all of my other CPOS. But tighter just about everywhere else than all my other CPOs. Moving up to a S from XS it would have swallowed me so I’m glad I take the XS. Just odd sizing compared to other IH Tops. Sleeves fit more like some of my westerns that are size S. Doing the half role thing works. I am hopeful that once the fabric breaks in and the sleeve kind of crease and settle in they will be better. This has been my grail piece for a while as I’m a sucker for indigo/black especially with tonal stitching. Seems like everyone across the board has had similar sizing issues. None the less great CPO!
-
@Ral1121
You could be right, I think remember seeing the untucked and maybe the 293 is what I saw quick. Maybe assumed had as well. I looked at the shirts quick when checking out. Maybe it’s good they don’t have it in stock, my wallet will be stoked. -
-
got the XL today , but definitely way too big
sad as it is but both L and XL are not working for me. -
@Daniel-San cut the beer out hit the gym maybe time to make it happen
-
lost 12 kg mate
-
@Daniel-San couldn’t you wear the XL as a jacket? I know I was furious for a time about my oversized 3XL 62 Wabash. Now I’m so happy I kept it because I basically can wear it over anything and after some washes it somehow still fits so well.
-
Received mine today. Really love this fabric and the toughness but for $419 dollars i would expect a better alignment of the pockets. I understand is people making these shirts but the space difference is just too much. This wont stop me from buying upcoming products so if anyone is looking for a size Large and doesn’t mind these differences there will one coming right back.
-
@hugothecowboy I bought a large and mine is like this too. I don't mind though. What I noticed after reading your post and looking at mine is that the shorter side is most likely the result of less fabric being used on that side of the shirt. If you measure from the side seam to the end of the placket and then do the same (at the same point in the shirt from the other side), the side with the pocket closer to the placket is shorter in length (in terms of the width). This is why there is a discrepancy in distance from the placket while the distance to the sleeve seem is about the same. So I think this might be a mistake on the pattern and how the fabric was cut. Not sure if all larges are like this since this is only a sample size of two.
I know this explanation probably doesn't matter to you and if you are unhappy then you should return it. I thought I would just share my observations in case anyone else was confused about what is going on or why this is happening.
-
Couldn’t this also just be normal production tolerance being exaggerated by the 19 oz denim rather than an actual pattern mistake? If the pocket-to-side-seam measurements are basically the same, maybe one front panel ended up slightly narrower, but with fabric this thick and stiff, couldn’t small differences in cutting, sewing, placket construction, or how the panels relax account for that too?
-
@hugothecowboy this doesn't bug me. I sort of want it actually. haha what are the measurements?
