IH-728-IND - 14oz Selvedge Denim Work Pants - Indigo

[Appfaff]

Thank You @Giles !!!

[Giles]

Hey, it was your idea…..

[Paul9221]

@Giles:

Brings the waist in if you want it to….

Thanks, G!  So, the measurements on the chart right now for waist are with the cinch all of the way out.  How much can we bring the waist in with it?

And on the opposite end of the spectrum of that question, how much will the waist stretch?

[Giles]

You could probably do 4", but it would look bloody messy.

Same as any of the other 14oz jeans, so about an inch.

[Paul9221]

Thanks G!

[AdamJ]

Chesson is wearing Tag 32

[Appfaff]

This silhouette looks remarkable!

Do you guys think hemming on the short side is the way to go?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AdamJ]

NOW LIVE

[Appfaff]

So Stoked for these! I went with a shorter inseam to replicate the Chesson swag on these pics

[sabergirl]

I’m really glad to see they will be in continuous production. I can’t really swing any more new pants while I’m saving up for FW21. The measurements look great!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Appfaff]

@sabergirl - I couldn't agree more! The measurements turned out PERFECT - even a bit more taper than the OG 712s it seems.

[popvulture]

Same! I didn't even realize I wanted a pair of these until just now, but I'll have to wait a while til I can swing it. They look great.

[Appfaff]

Can’t wait until you do!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TeflonDon]

This looks interesting.  Can anyone compare to the “usual” cuts?

[Appfaff]

It’s more like a chino cut, but if you think of a 634 with a bit more tailoring, but not as slim in the top as a 666, you are close.

Fitted top block, regular thigh and knee with gentle taper to hem.

You can get them hemmed with chainstitch for a “jeans” look or do a chino hem for a bit more heritage look (like Giles did in his sample).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TeflonDon]

Thanks. That is pretty much what I was hoping for. I like the 777 but could use a roomier too box, especially for summer, and the 634 is too wide at the bottom while the 666 may have too narrow thighs. This looks like at brilliant solution.

[Appfaff]

you and me both @TeflonDon ! the 777 is my favorite cut, but I like a bit more room to tuck in shirts when needed. And as I am writing this wearing some 634s, my only change on them would be about 1' tighter hem (Which these 728s offer in the same tagged size.

[spitfiredealer]

These measurements look great. As do the fit pics

[Appfaff]

These are perfect in every way [emoji170]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Palmer]

That's a perfect fit @Appfaff.

The measurements for these pants are truly perfect.