IH-829-IND - 21oz Serge Work Pants - Indigo
-
@jordanscollected Looks great, Jeff
Looking forward to seeing the 21 oz. Serge Tux 
-
@sabergirl did you size up? You said you weren't decided.
They look good on you, cut is made for long legs. -
@sabergirl I have not
but this may push me in that direction …yours look amazing and I can definitely see the evo. Thanks for posting! -
@sabergirl great fit Ann and the wide cuffs with sneakers aren’t weird looking at all. It’s something feared.
-
-
@Tom-Longarms These look SO good on you! Somehow you make the rise look much higher than it actually is as it's fairly similar to a 634 no?
Also for @ShopatIronHeart I think the description on the page is from another product:
"*Features & Construction
- Relaxed cut
- Two rear button-down pockets
- Button-down cargo pockets
- Side hand warmer pockets with coin pouch
- Heavy twill pocket bags
- Brass rivets
- 7 reinforced belt loops sewn into the waistband
- Iron Heart branded tack button waist fastening
- Universal zipper fly* "
-
@Tom-Longarms These look awesome on you! And I agree, despite it not being very common I personally love the work cut more than the 634. Fingers crossed that the 684 is the answer to my hopes
-
@m4xime hey thanks
I have 634 in 14oz broken twill that I bought before these came out in order to get fit that usually people get on this forum. But the thing is maybe I’m a bit too tall(196cm)and they look like skinny jeans on me and low rise doesn’t help(I like 888).. I mean they are fine but not what I was going for.
Now these are about the same waist size (1cm bigger than my 634) and front rise is about the same. But the back rise is more than 2cm bigger and so is the thigh and knee (around 2 cm bigger) hem is obviously way bigger and all that did the trick for me.
If you got any questions just let me know
️ -
@freepickin thanks
Yeah for me the cut is not even similar even though on paper it seems like that. Again people with different proportions could make both look the same.
I have great expectations from the 684 cut as well
-
@Tom-Longarms Thank you. I've only got a pair of 888 as I feel the same about low rise. I wonder if I could make those work pants work with my 32" waist and 27" inseam. I was eyeing up either 684 or 1955 as my next pair but I wish the 1955 hem was a tad wider.
-
-
@Mister_Brue Yes but not by much at all based on others checking measurements for me in the 1955s thread sadly.
-
@m4xime I was half joking, but it’s a shame because the rise is on point. Have you managed to try a pair on?
-
@Mister_Brue Unfortunately no. It doesn't tend to be stocked at Rivet & Hide and the stock goes so fast when it's put online but I might just go for it when it's re-stocked and size up 1.
