Our Cuts

[JohnM]

^ That's great Giles. Would be nice to see the 1955 added in there at some point.

[Alex]

@JohnM said in Our Cuts:

^ That's great Giles. Would be nice to see the 1955 added in there at some point.

We are in the process of making the 1955 more 'core', so it will be added to this, and other cut refernce material soon, but we need physical jeans in hand to do so, so it cannot be until the restock...

[SFMCfranky]

I haven’t been able to find any description of 633. I ask because it is referenced in the upcoming Self Edge 25 drop.

[Tago Mago]

@SFMCfranky 633 is a Self Edge exclusive cut similar to the 634 but with a taper from the knee down

[SFMCfranky]

@Tago-Mago

Thanks!

[CuseMM]

634 vs 1955

Re: Our Cuts

Can anyone give me the plain English answer to the difference between these cuts? I love the 634s but would be willing to try a higher rise and narrower leg opening.

[sabergirl]

That’s the difference. Maybe add a little fuller through the knee on the 1955. Not much more to add.

[Giles]

@CuseMM said in Our Cuts:

634 vs 1955

Re: Our Cuts

Can anyone give me the plain English answer to the difference between these cuts? I love the 634s but would be willing to try a higher rise and narrower leg opening.

https://ironheart.co.uk/pages/our-core-cuts

And:

https://ironheart.co.uk/pages/cut-comparison

[CuseMM]

Thank you! Awesome way to visualize it!

[CuseMM]

@sabergirl So 888 or 1955?

[yannis]

@CuseMM. If you want the taper to start above the knee and you are ok with a smaller mid thigh to knee measurement 888. If you want the taper to start below the knee then 1955

[sabergirl]

Yanni’s is on the right track. But really, you should measure a pair of jeans you love, and try to find the measurement chart for one of IH’s cuts that matches that of comes closest.

[CuseMM]

I’ve been wearing 634s for probably 7-10 years but always had a few nits about them