Watches - another OCD problem
-
Couldn’t make it past about five minutes of that vid @Aussie-Ben . Seems there’s other reasons that world isn’t for me besides not having money
.
-
Quite excited to be collecting this today, though then have the lengthy wait until Feb 26 to wear it on my wedding day -
@LewisStonehouse Congratulations on both fronts! Enjoy the watch and your upcoming nuptials.
-
There it is. Big fan of that Calatrava @Giles, would also be my first choice if I was going for a Patek
-
@LewisStonehouse Perfect! And the Montblanc as well
-
@Giles 206.032
-
@LewisStonehouse ...just so you know, that Lange's are notorious for service work if not worn every day. You will need to wear it daily to ensure that it stays perfectly lubricated...
...or you can try telling your better half that and see how it goes. Congratulations once again. Beautiful watch
-
I thought that is was @LewisStonehouse , just wanted to double check. It's a beaut....
-
@goosehd cheers Dennis
it’s fresh back from a full movement restoration, new strap, dial, hands and crystal and a polish. I’ll keep it wound even if I don’t wear it every day (that’s what the sub is for)
-
I should say, they provided the service papers with it, that work came to a cool £7,100
-
@LewisStonehouse ...please realize that I was joking about you not being able to wear it until your wedding day and that I was giving you an excuse to wear it more frequently up to that date
-
@goosehd Mum’s the word!
-
@Giles your endorsement has increased the value significantly. Ta
-
@LewisStonehouse that Lange is lovely, but you already knew that.
@Giles the Patek 6196P is lovely, but I'd probably spend the money on the less pretty Zenith GFJ because it's got a resurrected observatory chronometer movement. Here it is on the platinum bracelet, which adds another $50K to the price tag.