IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters

[ROman]

@Mister_Brue said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

I thought this looked rather old skool.

Checked by Matt =@Winchy

[Matt]

Fit great.

[goosehd]

@Matt yes, they do!! Congrats on an awesome score!!

[Tago Mago]

@Matt conjured out of nowhere. You truly are the dark wizard. Looking great

[yannis]

Great fit @Matt. Do those fit similar to a 634 or a 666?

[goosehd]

@yannis …in the middle with aspects of both.

[yannis]

Thanks @goosehd

[Giles]

I know who his dealer is

[Tago Mago]

@Matt is lucky we don’t have the same tag size, otherwise I might be tempted to get those pants off him the next time we meet

[goosehd]

@Tago-Mago he’s like the Jason Momoa of Ironheart. Everyone want’s to get into @Matt pants

Please show that to Katie

[Matt]

Fortunately I have a dealer and a backup dealer. Depends on how specific of a fix I’m looking for.

[Matt]

Thanks to everyone. I love me some Busters. @goosehd is correct on fit. Just a hair slimmer than 634.

[ROman]

@Giles said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

I know who his dealer is

So do I.

[goosehd]

[Mizmazzle]

@Matt these are wicked and fit so damn good! congrats!!

[Daniel San]

@Matt
does your dealer have some 461s ?

[ROman]

Nein

[Giles]

I was going to answer for you, but thought it rude

[popvulture]

@Matt agreed. I was expecting them to be like 888s with a wider leg opening (my dream), but mine fit a good bit slimmer. Def between 666 and 634.

[Matt]

Yeah, it’s hard to compare to newer models because it’s so similar to those two which is why they went defunct. Sadly. They’re perfect for me. Although I have enough pairs now to last me for a bit so I really can’t complain.