IH-805 - 21oz Indigo Selvedge Denim Double Knee Overalls
-
@DCWS2020 you are welcome. I'm glad they arrived safely.
The fit looks fantastic! -
@DCWS2020 they look great dude
-
Looks awesome!
-
Is there an ETA for a restock?
-
@rheubanks last ETA was End Feb/Early March.
As you may be aware, these are rough estimates. We'll keep this thread posted with any updates
-
@AdamJ Sounds good. Thank you.
-
to my bib brothers (and sisters) out there, do the 888's fit anything like these from the knee to the waist? I love how comfy these things are but im on the hunt for some UHR or XHS and wondering if the 888 will be of similar fit? My 634's are very tight around the thighs/upper box and are quite uncomfortable these days.
-
@Noahf nah not really, the 805 are way more relaxed. However…. As a big legged fella myself, I wear the 888 cut in the same (tag) waist size as the 805 and they both fit great (albeit very differently). Think quite a few of the bibbers are the same/wear the 634 cut
-
@Noahf the overalls are larger in the top block than any other jean because the waist does not have to be fitted (because of the straps) but the 1955 cut is the closest to overalls dimensions. Also the old 634SR is VERY roomy in the legs and has a waist smaller than the tagged size.but those are long extinct.
-
Yea very different fits. I Don't own any 888's, but I have a few 634 and 666. The 805's are their own beast because they are more loose throughout the entire leg and waist block. Not baggy, but just more room overall. I love 'em.
-
I own several pairs of 888s in size 34 or 35. Also own some 634s, size 35. My 805s are 34 and are more roomy than any IH jean I own. As chrisjohnnick stated, they are not baggy just more room throughout the top block and entire leg area. Wearing them right now as I type!
-
I would now class the 634 as a "slimmer" straight leg having had the 805. Roomy without being baggy, the 805 is very, very comfy.
-
@AdamJ THANK YOU!
-
Yus. Locked n loaded.
-
-
@AdamJ
Will IH Germany get some too ?
