IH-816DD - Double Indigo Rope Dyed Canvas Work Pants

[Giles]

There will be a little, but duck does not stretch as much as denim.

[Max Power]

Not sure wether the thighs are big enough for shorts. i don't want them to fit tight and even sizing up to 36 would probably not be enough.

[sabergirl]

Yep, thighs are a bit narrow for me, too. Saved from temptation!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[FurattoHeddo]

Same here, thighs are too narrow for this cut…

[Max Power]

I found this to be the case in a lot of the latest Releases, but that might just be me. I like / need above 13"-13,25" in 34.

[Sreeni]

I asked this for DWCxUHR and I am asking it for the IH-816DD.
I found the 11.8 inches room for thigh of the IH-6634 (tag size 30) narrower than I wanted.  It is 11.3 for the IH-816DD. Does this mean this one won't fit my legs or will I have to wear it to be sure?
Also, will every pair of IH pants with thighs smaller than 11.8 be too tight for me?
Please advise. Thanks

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

[Giles]

Basically yes & yes…

[Sreeni]

@Giles - Thanks for the reply.

It is sad because it means that this pair and most other IH jeans won't fit my legs.
So is it a smart idea to go from a tag size of 30 to 34 and then get the waist reduced by a tailor?

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

[sabergirl]

I think that drastic of a reduction would be difficult to pull off and still maintain the integrity of the pants. I have some 634sb that another forum member had tailored from a 38 to 34 inch waist, and they bunch a little bit in strange places.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[UnTucked]

@Sreeni:

I asked this for DWCxUHR and I am asking it for the IH-816DD.
I found the 11.8 inches room for thigh of the IH-6634 (tag size 30) narrower than I wanted.  It is 11.3 for the IH-816DD. Does this mean this one won't fit my legs or will I have to wear it to be sure?
Also, will every pair of IH pants with thighs smaller than 11.8 be too tight for me?
Please advise. Thanks

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

I'm new here, but I think measuring your current best fitting pants per the IHUK guide will answer all of your questions.

But, ultimately common sense dictates that 11.8>11.3, so if the IH-6634 didn't fit, these surely won't with less fabric stretch…..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Giles]

@Sreeni:

It is sad because it means that this pair and most other IH jeans won't fit my legs.
So is it a smart idea to go from a tag size of 30 to 34 and then get the waist reduced by a tailor?

I'm afraid that isn't smart.  May=be we are not the jeans for you…..Sorry....

[zatenm]

Copped mine [emoji3] Now at the tailor for hemming, can't wait to get them back!

[deanclean]

I'm jealous. canada is a little farther than you I guess. Enjoy em

[zatenm]

Thanks @deanclean [emoji106]

[deanclean]

Got mine today. Sometimes the anticipation leads up to a let down. Not in this case. These are my new favourite slacks![emoji3] and well worth the wait

[zatenm]

Couldn't agree more @deanclean. Congrats on your receiving your pair…! Mine are just back from hemming. These will seriously compete with my jeans as my daily beaters.

(What a fabric!)

[zatenm]

Super crappy quick fit pics from cloudy yesterday:

Quickly put to good use - first wear to work today [emoji4]
Makes a great pairing with the TW112 IMO (or any indigo western for that matter, especially if you're not too keen on the classic Canadian tux look)

Close-up comparo with the 112 (again under pale evening light). The DD indigo is very deep and rich:

Better pics hopefully soon!

[deanclean]

These look like they fit great I'm loving mine too. Haven't hemmed them yet cause it looks like they may scrunch up a little in the legs. I love the blue stitching on the blue material. Not flashy at all.

[davito]

Cool man nice pants and Shirt too

[Giles]