IH-777D - 17oz Duck Super Slim Tapered Cut Jeans - Brown

[manufc10]

These look great.  I dig the choice of making the W black on the pocket.

[motojobobo]

@manufc10:

These look great.  I dig the choice of making the W black on the pocket.

I found that a very cool detail too.

[AdamJ]

@manufc10 Is that any better?

[manufc10]

@AdamJ:

@manufc10 Is that any better?

It is..thanks dude.

[Stuart.T]

Ah fudge, I am in between 36 and 38. One too small the other a tad too big. These look awesome as well.

@AdamC any of the 38 labels closer to a 37.5? That could work…

[AdamC]

@Stuart.T Just measured the tag 38's and the smallest waist is a 37.8".  I have measured a load of tag 36 for good measure and could not come close to 37.5".

[justin]

This post is deleted!

[neph93]

@justin:

I notice the rear rise on these is about 1.5 inches smaller than the 666D. Does that mean it sits lower on the waist?

One of the differences between the 666 and the 777 is a lower rise. As you correctly surmise they will sit lower on the waist as a result.

[Sam]

In the wild

[justin]

This post is deleted!

[neph93]

@justin:

@neph93 pulled the trigger. Thanks!

Good man. It really looks like the duck and the 777 cut are a match made in heaven. Let us know how it goes.

[rocket]

oh ducking yeah….

[hairydangler]

You are hilarious in that awesome photo rocket. Nice choice of trouser and hat!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Crit_Obs]

Rookie-alert but i gotta seek knowledge possessed by men wiser than me (so that would be most everyone, then):

If looking for pants one-step above denim jeans on the dressiness-scale, would these duckies do similar to a pair of chinos? I’m starting in a new job on monday and I realize there’s a void between suits and jeans in my wardrobe, so I think I should consider picking up either these or IH-721 in khaki. I prefer these for the heaviness of the material and measurements-wise both options would seem to work.

[hairydangler]

@Crit_Obs  I dont claim to be wise but I think for a step up from jeans then chinos for sure is a fantastic option and for a thicker fabric the whipcord work pants are also an excellent choice. I consider these 777D at the same level as jeans.

[Dion]

I agree with daltmeyer. The 721 are an excellent choice for smart looking trousers whereas the ducks are in the same rugged category as jeans.

[rocket]

While I agree with the wise men above, I think someone can dress these smart as well. At least as long as they are new…
But I would fill your void with the 721 too for now  Chinos are always a good choice!

@daltmeyer Cheers, all about recycling these days 

[Giles]

Or you go IH-816.  Duck, but pants not 5 pocket jeans…..

[rocket]

real wise man speaks

[neph93]

@Dion:

I agree with daltmeyer. The 721 are an excellent choice for smart looking trousers whereas the ducks are in the same rugged category as jeans.

@daltmeyer:

@Crit_Obs  I dont claim to be wise but I think for a step up from jeans then chinos for sure is a fantastic option and for a thicker fabric the whipcord work pants are also an excellent choice. I consider these 777D at the same level as jeans.

I’m in broad agreement with these upstanding gents. I bought my 666D as a dressier option and they function very well in that role the first few wears. Then the glorious IH duck evo starts and you realise you’ve got a new pair of gnarly brown jeans on your hands.