Watches - another OCD problem
-
Gold loses atoms while wearing it rubs off, so to speak. This does not happen with platinum. Here the atoms are just shifting back and forth while wearing. They do not leave their atomic compound. At some point (in 1000 years) gold disappeared through wear, platinum never. Is that too much physics? Sorry!
Thats awesome! Thanks for sharing! [emoji41]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
at this rate, I'll settle for vibranium. it's stronger than steel and 1/3 of the weight. it is also vibration absorbent.
-
Hmm… OK. ::)
With all due respect, this sounds like an urban legend. I'm not sure that the metallic bond of gold is or not weaker than that of platinum. (There's basically no atomic bonding for gold or platinum under normal condition as both are non reactive.)
In any case, I don't think it has any different impact over a normal human life. To say that platinum is harder than gold is confusing because gold is never used in its pure state and its alloyed forms are reasonably hard. Pure gold is more malleable than pure platinum but pure platinum is actually more ductile than pure gold, so it depends what we mean by "hard". Pure gold will show knocks more readily than pure platinum, but a platinum ring or bangle is more likely to stretch. Under normal circumstances, neither will magically evaporate or dissolve over a few thousand years.
-
My wedding ring is made of Black diamond. Sometimes other materials rub off on it, but It's completely unscratchable and is even slightly harder than a diamond gemstone. Maybe "Elysium black" will get into watches.
-
There are extremely hard ceramic cases, e.g., Grand Seiko's SBGJ233 and SBGC221 (in combo with titanium).
There's been a few watches with transparent sapphire cases, e.g., https://www.watchtime.com/featured/time-in-the-clear-5-watches-with-sapphire-cases/ .
-
Speaking of unique watch case materials, has anyone ever handled a tantalum watch? I know that Panerai made a limited model years ago (PAM00192). My wedding ring is made of tantalum and it seems quite heavy, not sure how comfortable a tantalum watch would be for daily wear.
Several years ago, when Julie and I were killing time before a dinner reservation in Las Vegas, we stopped in a watch store in the shopping center underneath The Venetian. It was a slow day, so the sales guy was happy to spend a little while nerding out on the watches with me. He showed me a Vacheron Constantine with a tantalum case. I don't remember it being particularly heavy, though that was a while ago.
The clips the doctor used for my vasectomy are tantalum, but I have to admit, I haven't noticed the weight at all…
-
I once took a look at an F.P. Journe Chronomètre Bleu, which had a Tantalum case.
I don't recall it being particularly heavy, nor does the review at Monochrome reference its weight, so it's probably more akin to a gold watch on a strap than a lead weight.
-
That’s a lovely, lovely watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Picked up a new White Dial Stainless Steel SkyDweller yesterday from Wempe in London.
It looks like I have managed to cultivate a buyer profile with them and they have been pretty good at supplying me with some Rolex pieces.
-
Was this the same trip that you went with the in-laws and their buffet vouchers?
Maybe; it was a long time ago. That was actually my father-in-law's brother with the coupons. In a related story that's too long to tell here, my mother-in-law and my wife now own their house.
-
Went to the Omega Boutique to try on some shiny things. I originally was on a mission in to try on the X33 which I have wanted to own since Gen 1. The potential upkeep on them is very high though but I’m still thinking about it.
Also looked at a Speedy on the new tapering bracelet which feels amazing
And lastly tried on a Seamaster Nekton
I have a promo code for our boutique so I MIGHT end up picking up one of the three. Originally I had my heart set on the X33 but I also have an Aerospace which is somewhat similar. Also the potential high price battery changes etc are on my mind. The Speedy is lovely and I’ve owned one before. Is the sapphire sandwich worth the price increase? Mine was hesalite and IMO felt pretty durable as a daily. Lastly the Nekton is at least to me a good looking watch but it looks better on a strap v the bracelet. I have a LOT of good divers though.
Any input?
-
I've normally not sold my watches, but I've been known to move safe-queens in the past.
I bought this Rolex Hulk at an AD in 2012, if I recall. I do love the dial and its ever-changing range of brilliant green hues. But I find it a tad blingy, and given the profit margin, I am contemplating moving it to a buyer who has expressed interest. I just need to say yes.
I find myself gravitating towards the same 3 watches. That says something.
-
@Anesthetist- you sounds like you're trying to talk yourself out of the one you really want. Get the X33. You owned a Speedy and didn't keep it, which means you're unlikely to keep this one. And as you say, you own a lot of divers already and you don't sound in love with the Nekton, which means you're unlikely to keep it. On the other hand, you could buy the Speedy and then, in a couple of years, when you've tired of it, I could relieve you from the burden of owning it…
@QuantumMechanic- go ahead and sell the Hulk. Take the huge profit and never look back. It's a great looking watch, but the market for Rolexes is insane right now. No telling how long it will last.
-
@Anesthetist I think the sapphire sandwich is more refined and less tool watchy. Display case back of the new master chronometer, coaxial movement, applied versus printed Omega logo, I think it has the contrasting polished and brushed bracelet instead of the more utilitarian, less blingy all brushed. It’s the one I would pick. But Speedy purists would disagree.
-
@Anesthetist how does the battery upkeep of the X33 compare to servicing a Speedy? And how often will it need replacing?
I've got a feeling that Omega sometimes replace the entire quartz movement in the X33 during servicing, which might be what bumps the price up. That said, their website says it costs $750 (AUD) to service a quartz chronograph, versus $1130 for a mechanical, so you might come out ahead.
I'm not up on the arcana of the sapphire and Hesalite Speedy. I believe that the former is more durable, and has a display back, but the latter is more original. That said, you're unlikely to be exploring space, so having a flight qualified watch isn't too important.
The Nekton looks good, but I would probably hold out for the none-so-black Seamaster instead. The Bond watch is nice, particularly on the titanium strap, but the 007 branding is a turn off, and it is a lot more expensive.
@QuantumMechanic I agree with @Chris that if you don't wear the Hulk, you might as well take advantage of the Rolex bubble and offload it.
-
@Anesthetist
Optical the first two are nice. But the first omega has huge number of LCD digits on display. That is question of taste. If you like this functionallity, take this. I myself like mechanical watches most. Years ago I saw the GS 9f quartz movements and have never got it out of my head since then.
Go for the X33;)
@QuantumMechanic
That is a nice hulk. Green is the colour of Rolex. Sell it now and later you will be sad about this decision? I would keep this unique masterpiece
keep in mind you got it for a moderate price
