• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Fall/Winter 2026 - Collection Preview Now Live

    IH-1955S-18 - 18oz Vintage Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo

    Non Seasonal Product Preview
    29
    50
    4.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      SuitOfUHF
      Raw and Unwashed
      @AdamJ
      Joined:

      @AdamJ Well you have to control for the user's activity in order to have an apples-to-apples comparison. I just wanted to know if the looser vintage weave and construction makes for a weaker fabric, compared to Iron Heart's regular fare

      last edited by jfive67J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GilesG
        Giles
        IHUK Crew
        Joined:

        I wear every denim for a year (almost every day, and whatever I do) when it is first released. All last about a year before they start giving up on me......

        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • jfive67J
          jfive67
          Raw and Unwashed
          @SuitOfUHF
          Joined:

          @SuitOfUHF

          Some people have actually observed the contrary. Heavier fabrics can abrade more at the crotch and have blowouts earlier than expected.

          I think cut matters more for general durability than fabric. Generally none of my 1955s have broken down versus heavyweight denim in slimmer cuts where crotch needed repair out after about a year

          Same thing goes for suits that I have. I’ve got some super 140 suits with relaxed cuts that have outlasted flannels that were on the tighter side


          Life's for living!

          last edited by S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • steelworkerS
            steelworker
            見習いボス
            Joined:

            To me it’s about sizing. Wear jeans like they’re painted on & hey presto! Blowout in no time.

            Those are my principles, and if you don't like them…
            Well, I have others.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • S
              SuitOfUHF
              Raw and Unwashed
              @jfive67
              Joined:

              @jfive67 Tight areas are sure to break down faster. Not really a problem for me as I wouldn't buy a pair if it bites me anywhere. (Incidentally I'm a big believer in the utility of crotch gussets, but I don't need to get on my soapbox here)

              Maybe I'll try a slightly different question: Do you think Iron Heart stands out with its 18oz vintage as much as it does with the 21oz? Considering there are a ton of Japanese repro brands specializing in "vintage" denims, which I just have to point out cost ~$100 less than IH? (Yes I'm aware this is the IH forum, so maybe I can also try this question in more neutral places)

              last edited by SuitOfUHF goosehdG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • goosehdG
                goosehd
                Mod Squad
                @SuitOfUHF
                Joined:

                @SuitOfUHF I have worn the 18oz for years and it is one of my favourites. I tend to prefer the 16oz slub, 17oz natural, and the 18oz vintage over the heavier denims that IH has to offer, but that’s me. We also have members here who only like to wear 21oz and up. That is the beauty of this brand in that there are denim’s here for everyone.

                Does the 18oz stand out? For me yes and others no. Does the 21oz? Yes and probably the most purchased denim that IH offers and really is one of the first that was offered.

                You are on a IH forum so most of the responses will have an inherent bias in their responses. For more neutral unbiased responses, you probably will have to ask elsewhere. Although, we all admit that we have other manufacturers that we like and not really a secret. Many of those brands have quite active threads discussing those likes. Orslow, Ship John, Samurai, etc. Other Brands and Shops

                Is one better than another…

                Here’s why I like IH: I know what I’m buying, how it fits, and how durable it is. The customer service from the staff at IHUK is hands down one of the best. When there is an issue, I am able to contact them to answer my questions or seek help. Not many places have that level of customer service before, during, or after a sale. I can’t do that with other brands. Is that worth the difference in cost? Most definitely.

                Truth be told, I don’t see a huge difference between the brands regarding pricing, but the brand reputation is unmeasurable making any difference in price a moot point.

                Just my $.02 from being around for a few years and my experiences,

                “our policy of no discussions regarding politics, religion, asparagus, and other controversial issues.” - Andrew

                last edited by goosehd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 11
                • W
                  welfare_burrito
                  Raw and Unwashed
                  Joined:

                  Any ideas on timeline?

                  last edited by AdamJA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AdamJA
                    AdamJ
                    IHUK Crew
                    @welfare_burrito
                    Joined:

                    @welfare_burrito ETA Sept

                    The devil is in the detail..

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • weftyarnW
                      weftyarn
                      啓蒙家
                      Joined:

                      Probably has been asked a thousand times but can someone who wears both 888 and 1955 report on how the two compare in daily wearing, not just from a number / measurement standpoint? 🙂

                      Use it or lose it.

                      last edited by steelworkerS twinningT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • steelworkerS
                        steelworker
                        見習いボス
                        @weftyarn
                        Joined:

                        @weftyarn to me the 888 fit is like a more fitted 55 id that makes sense. And alot would depend on the denim

                        Those are my principles, and if you don't like them…
                        Well, I have others.

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • twinningT
                          twinning
                          @weftyarn
                          Joined:

                          @weftyarn The 1955S-21 thread has a lot of discussion and comparison between the 1955 and 888, starting with this post but scroll up/down as this one is kind of in the middle of the discussion: https://forum.ironheart.co.uk//post/878030. Also the cut comparison tool on the IH site is helpful if you are good at visualizing what diagrams look like in 3D (I'm not lol): https://ironheart.co.uk/pages/cut-comparison.

                          I can't speak to daily wear experience--I tried on the 14oz 1955 when it came out last year but didn't buy it, to my eternal regret, but I will say the 1955 felt like it had a lot more room in the lower thigh and knee. The 888 feels really slim on me, especially in that area just above/at the knee. Still not sure why I didn't buy them when I had the chance...

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright Iron Heart 2025.