IHSH-430-BRN - Slubby Heavy Flannel Check Work Overshirt - Brown

[Aussie Ben]

@Alex yeah cool as, been holding back on buying some more IH gear, just in case it drops any time soon. I’ll be spewing if I miss this one.

[Boit]

@ShopatIronHeart is the pricing correct on this: $400 for work, $379 for western (IHSH-431)? If so, what changed?…usually cost is higher for the western.

[Tago Mago]

@Boit it’s not a traditional work shirt, as explained in the first post:

„Designed as an overshirt, this cut is an ideal winter layering piece, worn either as an outer or mid layer. Like our traditional work shirt, the cut includes classic patch chest pockets (complete with a pen holder) and button fastenings throughout. Where it differs is in its looser fit, straight hem, and split side-seam gussets, which are more characteristic of our mechanic shirt cut.“

I assume this is part of the reason

[Boit]

…ah so maybe less yield in the fabric because of the bigger wider design? I always figured the complexity of the western’s yoke and pockets was reason for the price difference, but sounds like this one might go in the other direction. either way it is a nice looking shirt.

[Aussie Ben]

This can’t come soon enough

[Alex]

@Boit to be honest, I didnt ask the question, just trusted that we were not being given the wrong information from Haraki.

[Ross]

plugin-calendar-event-wrapper:start |||IHSH-430-BRN Launch|||

IHSH-430-BRN Launch

[[moment:time-date-view, utc, 1762272000000, 1762272300000, false]] UTC
See time in your time zone

IHSH-430-BRN Launch

[[calendar:response_no]] [[calendar:response_maybe]] [[calendar:response_yes]]

[[calendar:response_yes]] 13

[[calendar:response_maybe]] 0

[[calendar:response_no]] 0

plugin-calendar-event-wrapper:end

[Slash]

Oh boy, this one I was really waiting for, and I have like a suspicion I'm not the only one

[will6er]

Been thinking I prefer this cut to the Workshirt (marginally). Hope this sells fast like the green so we see more UHF in the cut next year.

[Slash]

@will6er Personally I'm waiting for measures, not sure the looser fit is for me, but maybe I need to test it to be convinced

[will6er]

@Slash Thats exactly what I wondered when I got the green. I sized down but would have been happy at normal size also I think and may do that next time.

[Biecher]

Hello, any information when the sizing information will be available? I will need some time to think and do some measurements.
Thank you.

[Tago Mago]

@Biecher the measurements will be posted as soon as the crew has had a chance to measure and upload. Probably not long as the release date has been posted

[AdamJ]

They will be online at some point today or tomorrow, plenty of time before release don't worry

[AdamJ]

Sizing chart can now be found in the first post.
Please be aware you may not be able to view the product’s website page leading up to launch, as it will be briefly offline whilst we prepare for the launch on Tuesday 4TH November at 1600GMT.

@Biecher

[catdad1]

@AdamJ looking at the calendar it looks like this one is scheduled for Tuesday of next week. Also @JoshC what size are you taking to layer this over a UHF or hoodie? Thanks!

[AdamJ]

@catdad1 Josh is off 'till next week mate so will get him to try one on Monday. Staff sizing and model pics to follow

[Slash]

Might need to order S and M on this one to compare...
S would be approx. the same size than my IHSH-402-NAV in "M" which fits nicely and where I can layer t-shirt + sweatshirt under (not an IH one ), but the sleeves are here 63.5 cm vs 65cm which might be too short.

Am I wrong or are the sleeves shorter on recent shirt from IH ? I basically ordered the Cotton/Lin from last SS season one size up because of the sleeves length.
Maybe this is intended (no critics here, it's IH choice off course) but I was wondering if it was the case.

Could be that this is because the intended look for this one is to be an over shirt in the first place, then that would make sense and I should probably go "M" here, but not sure I can assume the look (not so young anymore )

[AdamJ]

@Slash sleeve length varies from garment to garment (like all other dims), so comparing it to X product is largely redundant as there is no "standard". I appreciate sometimes it does not come out as people hope but generally, it is not a deliberate choice. I suspect you'll be able to find examples of recent shirts that have both longer and shorter sleeves.

[Slash]

@AdamJ Hey Adam, thank you for taking the time to respond, good to know !

And btw, I don't think it's a problem really, I think I remembered a post from Gilles (talking about a ex-colleague) saying that those "non-standard" measures from product to product were also what could make the day of someone, since all bodies are very different really.

Cheers !