IH-666S-142 - 14oz Selvedge Denim Slim Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo

[T.J.]

The 16oz Vintage Denim is more breathable than the 14oz Denim IMO

[Cole]

Any restock of size 34 in sight? @Giles @Alex

[Giles]

Within the month

[Graham]

RESTOCK

[Cole]

Finaly. 

Oh, an I still haven't got my notification e-Mail for the restock. Ist the system still messed up?

[Cole]

Right out of the bag

Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

[neph93]

@Cole:

Right out of the bag

Great fit, but that is no surprise. You must have the 666 sizing nailed on.

[mclaincausey]

Those look great!

[xtcclassic]

Anyone got any noticeable fades on the 142 denim? I’d love to see how they fade, god knows it’ll be a couple years before I see any significant fades on mine.

[Cole]

Thanks, @neph93 . If you gut long toothpick legs like I do, the 666 is your cut. That's why it fits me so well.

[rocket]

def a great fit @Cole and perfect summer jawns

[Cole]

After a week of regular wear they start to break in nicely.

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

[Graham]

RESTOCK

[AdamC]

RESTOCK

[JDoz]

Hey all,

Looking for some advice on overall fit of 666, this denim in particular as they should be really good for warmer months. Really looking for that pair to wear into the ground for 2-3 years.

I have a pair of IH-555-01 21oz and they’re pretty well amazing, about a year of wear on them. Unfortunately I have to say they’re a tad slim for me now. They still fit fine, but in general I want a bit more space around the thighs in particular.

I’ve measured up these in comparison as I should, it looks like the thighs are pretty much the same if not slimmer than the 555, is that correct? I can tell these are less tapered than the 555s, is that the main difference?

Also, I assume the 21oz are going to have less “space” in comparison to these because on them being double the weight? Would really appreciate some advice here, if there’s another fit that may work for this it would be great to know.

Cheers

[Alex]

@JackSyd:

I’ve measured up these in comparison as I should, it looks like the thighs are pretty much the same if not slimmer than the 555, is that correct? I can tell these are less tapered than the 555s, is that the main difference?

Full details of all the cuts and visual comparisons can be seen here:
https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans

In short, the entire top block will be slimmer in the 666 than the 555, but there is significantly less taper. The thigh is similar between the two when you compare actual waist to actual waist rather than tag size. Take a look here:

@JackSyd:

Also, I assume the 21oz are going to have less “space” in comparison to these because on them being double the weight? Would really appreciate some advice here, if there’s another fit that may work for this it would be great to know.

I personally dont find that denim weight makes a difference to the way the jeans fit other than the fact they have a different feel to them and therefore feel different on the legs and mould to the body differently / more or less quickly.

[neph93]

@JackSyd as mentioned the top block of the 666 is trimmer than the 555 with a lower rise. The thighs are often slimmer too. So you may want to consider sizing up. If you want something with a little more room than the 555 I’d look at the 888.

As @Alex says, the thickness and weight of the denim doesn’t really play much of a role in sizing.

[JDoz]

Thanks @neph93 and @Alex .

I've looked into it more and think the 666 could be a good option for me still, I'm slowly moving away from the slimmest jeans. If these are hemmed to the right length they always look great without being too bulky with extra folds. Thats just my opinion

I wanted to see if this denim takes the same amount of time to fade as the 21oz?

I've got 200+ days wear on the 555 21oz and they're only really now showing whiskers and fading.

Cheers

[Alex]

The 14oz will fade a little faster than the 21oz as it’s not been treated with anything to slow the fading.

[AdamJ]

RESTOCK