The one that got away. Lament the FOMO.

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

@peregrine:

This one: X634sX Flannel Lined Water-Resistant Jeans

Holy fuck, I just had a spontaneous orgasm

@kiya is there any chance of ever doing these again, maybe without the wax coating?

[kiya]

@Filthy:

@peregrine:

This one: X634sX Flannel Lined Water-Resistant Jeans

Holy fuck, I just had a spontaneous orgasm

@kiya is there any chance of ever doing these again, maybe without the wax coating?

No sorry, considering they took 2 years to sell through we won't be doing another run of these.

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

Dang, thanks anyway 

[hajduk]

I have one.  Tagged 32. Too thight at the waist. I am considering selling it. If someone…
Hems needs some repairs.
Sorry to pollute the thread with some sales[emoji18]

Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

[nurunuru]

Probably the olive IH-705 heavy cargo pants for me.  Nice 634-esque wide thighs and moderate rise.

Jeans are cool and all, but I spend the vast majority of the colder months in cargos, cos I carry a Costanza wallet and it's just too much of a pain in the arse not having big ol' side pockets everywhere I go.  Would be nice to see new (or just re-released) IH cargo offerings without the 888-inspired high rise of the current Division Road collabs.  I just can't really get behind a high front rise.  Maybe I'm in the minority, but I find it uncomfortable.

[emceeQ]

@sabergirl:

Clint has a couple of these for sale in the green right now, my friend! Check the buying/selling. [emoji6]

Thanks to you (and @Filthy and @Clint_D ) the FOMO is soon to be NOMO.  The stoke-age is real

[nurunuru]

@Steve:

Got to be the IHSH-215. The colour brown is underrated - plus goes well with denim. Would love to see this back, maybe as a western.

Right on.  This also stands to me out as the nicest UHF colourway to date.

[tody]

IHSH-261 / IHSH-270
Literally a day late and a dollar short.

[neph93]

@nurunuru:

Probably the olive IH-705 heavy cargo pants for me.  Nice 634-esque wide thighs and moderate rise.

Would be nice to see new (or just re-released) IH cargo offerings without the 888-inspired high rise of the current Division Road collabs.  I just can't really get behind a high front rise.  Maybe I'm in the minority, but I find it uncomfortable.

^ all of this

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

@emceeQ:

@sabergirl:

Clint has a couple of these for sale in the green right now, my friend! Check the buying/selling. [emoji6]

Thanks to you (and @Filthy and @Clint_D ) the FOMO is soon to be NOMO.  The stoke-age is real

I think @sabergirl deserves all the credit… I just reiterated what she said xD

[sabergirl]

Sweet, [mention]emceeQ [/mention] ! Just find me a fleece lined 6526j and we’ll call it even, y’all [emoji6]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chris]

I'm gonna go back to the product that brought me to Iron Heart, but was already sold out when I joined the forum to ask about it, the IH-800 single knee duck loggers. Since then, there have been other duck fabric pants, but for one reason or another- paraffin coated, double knee, wrong cut- none of them have worked for me. And I still dream about these; the 634 cut in a straightforward brown duck canvas…

[nurunuru]

@Chris:

I'm gonna go back to the product that brought me to Iron Heart, but was already sold out when I joined the forum to ask about it, the IH-800 single knee duck loggers. Since then, there have been other duck fabric pants, but for one reason or another- paraffin coated, double knee, wrong cut- none of them have worked for me. And I still dream about these; the 634 cut in a straightforward brown duck canvas…

@Chris  Not to give you undue hope or anything, but… Have you noticed how, maybe depending on your waist size, the 666D is essentially a mislabelled 634D?

e.g.

666D (Size 36)
Waist 34.5
Front rise 11.4
Rear rise 16.1
Thigh 13.1
Knee 9.5
Hem 9

634S-B (Size 34)
Waist 34
Front rise 11.0
Rear rise 15.8
Thigh 13.2
Knee 9.3
Hem 9.1

[sabergirl]

I would love an 800. I had a tagged 36 in my hands recently, that were way too short…and they were so slim I would probably have needed a 40 [emoji31]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chris]

@nurunuru:

@Chris  Not to give you undue hope or anything, but… Have you noticed how, maybe depending on your waist size, the 666D is essentially a mislabelled 634D?

e.g.

666D (Size 36)
Waist 34.5
Front rise 11.4
Rear rise 16.1
Thigh 13.1
Knee 9.5
Hem 9

634S-B (Size 34)
Waist 34
Front rise 11.0
Rear rise 15.8
Thigh 13.2
Knee 9.3
Hem 9.1

Hmmm, Covid related weight gain makes the 36 look possible.  I'll have to think about this now…

Thanks for pointing that out, @nurunuru

[nurunuru]

Yeah, no worries.

[Anesthetist]

The IHSW-45, the water and wind proof technical sweat jacket. What a minimalistic and high tech piece if kit, I should’ve bought a large when I had the chance.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Matt]

I always justify passing on stuff by telling myself that there’s always going to be new great stuff in the next collection.  This thread makes me think I’ve been living a lie.

[sabergirl]

[mention]nurunuru [/mention] is right about the cargoes! I will always want a pair of 718, and for that matter the hickory stripe ones, too. The old cut with lower front rise is key, though.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hajduk]

@Anesthetist:

The IHSW-45, the water and wind proof technical sweat jacket. What a minimalistic and high tech piece if kit, I should’ve bought a large when I had the chance.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same here…

Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk