IHSH-309-PUR - Ultra Heavy Flannel Western Shirt - Classic Check - Purple
-
@Filthy looks like a damn fine shirt to get loaded in
the brown purple and blue matches the colors of my liver
-
@Joberwocky I admire the willpower! The N1 will be sweet.
-
So these are def killing it with the pearl snaps! My new fav purple shirt. Only have two UHF…but still! It came in perfect time, because tomorrow is our engagement photos and this will be one of the IH shirts I'm wearing
-
-
Gonna look great in photos @Jordonf9 , congrats on the engagement AND shirr
-
Is this detail in cuff link area only on the Work Shirt or did it not make the final cut at all? I was really looking forward to it
-
That bias tape is not present on the western. It's just like a normal IH western UHF.
-
Is this detail in cuff link area only on the Work Shirt or did it not make the final cut at all?
All UHF work shirts have that taping. UHF westerns don’t. It has to do with garment engineering I think.
The button holes on work shirts either weaken the fabric to a degree that requires reinforcement, or the snaps on the western tolerate a folded hem, providing strength for the snaps. I’m not sure which.
The heavy denim CPO’s have taping too.. probably due to the weight of the fabric and/or size of the snaps.
-
Arrived today! Incredibly stoked on the fit (L) and fabric.
-
Paired with heavily worn-in 18 oz 555.
-
-
Shirt looks great. Pineapple looks intimidating [emoji1]
Lol ty. I usually prevail over the
, so fret not. -
When I got my shirt, I washed it on the delicate cycle at 30 deg. Here are the results of washing and then wearing it. Size is Medium. Note that the sleeve shortens when worn due to creasing.
New –> Wash --> Worn
Length: 74.0 --> 72.25 --> 72.25
Sleeve: 66.0 --> 65.50 --> 64.75
Shoulder: 43.5 --> 43.50 --> 43.50
P2P: 54.0 --> 53.00 --> 54.00
Waist: 51.0 --> 50.50 --> 51.00
Opening: 52.0 --> 51.00 --> 52.00 -
For some weird reason only a lot of L’s are left. Everything else is gone. It took a few hours, but I get the impression there were a lot of them.
We made a mistake. We decided to model our order bell curve on what size/quantities we had sold in total historically, prior to this we did it on what we had sold through the website. We felt that a larger sample would give us a better-predicted demand curve. What we forgot is that most of our retailers do not take the outlying sizes, so the bell curve was far too steep, hence the plethora of larges left.
We are reverting to the old way of doing it and adding extra XXXL and XXXXL…..
For me I normally would have ordered a L but based on sizing in the P2P when to XL. Loving this UHF!
-
We made a mistake. We decided to model our order bell curve on what size/quantities we had sold in total historically, prior to this we did it on what we had sold through the website. We felt that a larger sample would give us a better-predicted demand curve. What we forgot is that most of our retailers do not take the outlying sizes, so the bell curve was far too steep, hence the plethora of larges left.
We are reverting to the old way of doing it and adding extra XXXL and XXXXL…..
This is a mistake that will probably get me killed when my wife gets home.
