IH-555S-21 - 21oz Selvedge Denim Super Slim Jeans - Indigo PREVIOUSLY IH-555-01
-
"comfy rise and roomy top block" is a good way to describe 555 based on my experience - and the taper is not so dramatic that they look overly skinny. Very comfortable and well-tailored look imo, a slim fit that works well for a lot of people, but not all. These fill a unique spot in my collection.
-
Skinny fit, it´s relative, for me it´s just a slim tapered, like a 1955 or lvc 1954 with a more slim leg and front/back rise. Fit good on me or on people with VERY skinny legs. If not it´s ridiculous. And inverse, the 666 fit loose on me, ridiculous… I imagine a 634 on me...
Any idea for the 777, very Nice patch, fit, un alternative between 666 and 555.Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
"comfy rise and roomy top block" is a good way to describe 555 based on my experience - and the taper is not so dramatic that they look overly skinny. Very comfortable and well-tailored look imo, a slim fit that works well for a lot of people, but not all. These fill a unique spot in my collection.
Send pix of you and what are your favorite denim now, to compare fits.
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
I don't have a good pic, but here is a top block and legs, 555-01. In cooler weather I rotate these with various versions of 634 (over-dyed, s, vulcan, SExIH13), beatle busters and Devil's Ducks.
This summer I've mostly been wearing the 14oz 666L, Mr Freedom Okinawa and MN topsiders, and Roy Ducks. This is the 666L - as you noted, much different fit than the 555. So many choices - all good ones!
-
Giles, one 555 xhs 25oz is possible in the future ?
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
This new 25oz collaboration actually looks slimmer than the 555 if the size charts are correct:
http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=7879.msg418704#newI think this might be the reason for the change from this:
@Giles:Dear xx
The 555 cut will NOT be done in 25oz. We like to give our customers the option of being able to procreate at some time in the futrue.
Giles
to
@Giles:Never say never….But no plans....
-
Giles will know for sure, but I believe the first run and second run had very slight differences. The second run was about 0.5-0.8" smaller in the waist. Thighs were about the same though. However, I'm pretty sure R&H got the same restock ..maybe different measuring metods..?
-
IHUK definitly updated the sizing tables when the 2nd batch came in. I remember because I bought my pair the day they changed. The first batch were similar to/the same as the 555-03. You could always check with Danny and co if they updated their tables.
As ever, I'd like something between the 34 and 36 going by the IH sizes. Still looking at other cuts to see what would be best from what's in stock.
-
As ever, I'd like something between the 34 and 36 going by the IH sizes. Still looking at other cuts to see what would be best from what's in stock.
Oh my days, I do know how you feel…
I bagged a tagged 34 with a larger waist than the new measurements (35.1"). The guys and "gal" in Gosport will go the extra mile for you, so if a pair exists in stock that is a big 34 (or a small 36) they'll find it. Just ask. Btw I'm sure Danny will do the same.
