Samples - New Products We Are Working On

[neph93]

@Paul9221:

I would not mind a workshirt with snaps, especially copper ones!

There  has only ever been one w/s with snaps (black ones), and that was the IHSH-91. Apparently Haraki-san has some strict ideas about shirt fastening protocols and cuts. The ‘91 was an anomaly. Not to say it will never happen again though.

[The_Bourbon_Denim_Guy]

@Giles:

Late this month/early next….

WHOA!!  Alex told me y’all were working on a Stormrider like almost 2 years ago.  I had completely forgotten about it!  I live in Alaska, Stormrider is sort of a no brained for me [emoji2369]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Broark]

@neph93:

…but news came down the wire that there was some issues with making buttonholes, on the IHSH-75 (I think), and that production of denim workshirts was stopped. I think that goes for the JC workshirt too.

Thanks for the background, completely forgot about that.
That's such a bummer. 

[Alex]

22oz Traditional Type III (one washed)

22oz Traditional Type III (unwashed)

New 5oz Natural Indigo Chambray (supersedes the IHSH-133)

5.5oz Cotton/Linen Short Sleeve Chambray

IH-888S-SBG

[Dion]

Stunning stuff (esp. the Type IIIs)!

[manufc10]

Nice to see another lightweight chambray workshirt.  I love my 133.

[spitfiredealer]

Can we have some more details on the 888 SBG please? How’s the size of the sample compared to other variants of 888?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Brock]

Also, what size is the sample?? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[neph93]

@Brock:

Also, what size is the sample?? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Asked and answered… it’s a W33

[Alex]

@spitfiredealer:

Can we have some more details on the 888 SBG please? How’s the size of the sample compared to other variants of 888?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We havent measured the samples yet, but that doesnt really matter as we can tweak from a sample pattern. What were you thinking?

[spitfiredealer]

Thigh is always the main concern.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Brock]

@neph93:

@Brock:

Also, what size is the sample?? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Asked and answered… it’s a W33

Damn my fat ass!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Alex]

@spitfiredealer:

Thigh is always the main concern.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Giles & I were discussing the relative similarity of the 888 and 1955 cut and how we may be better to tweak one of them to give a slightly more marked difference..

[neph93]

@Brock:

@neph93:

@Brock:

Also, what size is the sample?? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Asked and answered… it’s a W33

Damn my fat ass!!

You mean your robust masculine physique I’m sure

[Brock]

@neph93:

@Brock:

@neph93:

@Brock:

Also, what size is the sample?? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Asked and answered… it’s a W33

Damn my fat ass!!

You mean your robust masculine physique I’m sure

Haha!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[spitfiredealer]

@Alex:

@spitfiredealer:

Thigh is always the main concern.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Giles & I were discussing the relative similarity of the 888 and 1955 cut and how we may be better to tweak one of them to give a slightly more marked difference..

Little bit less rear rise in the 888 and bigger thigh wouldn’t hurt

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[neph93]

@Alex:

Giles & I were discussing the relative similarity of the 888 and 1955 cut and how we may be better to tweak one of them to give a slightly more marked difference..

The 888 is perfect, please do not play too much. If you have to the rise could loose an inch but for the love of all that is good don’t touch the thigh.

[Alex]

No one said we would change the 888

[Brock]

More thigh is always better!! [emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[spitfiredealer]

Yeah I could live with the thigh staying the same but the rear rise can give a bit of nappy arse.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk