Photograph and Camera talk
-
@Steve I’ll definitely take a good look at the XE options, wasn’t aware about them. At this point I was hoping to make do with a single fixed-length lens (for sake of lightness, compactness and simplicity), realizing I must get used to that new situation after my previous setups.
This issue ties in with @Tobi ’s first point and I guess my hope was hinging on the 40 megapixel sensor, and hoping that the two ‘digital cropping’ options would end up quasi-covering the lack of additional focal lengths. @Tobi did that not work well enough for you?
I admit to being horribly lazy about post-processing so I very much doubt I’ll ever get into it. But I doubt I’ll play much with pre-set styles either. So not an important selling point in my case.
@pechelman intended use will be 99% sharing with people via Whatsapp/internet; and once in a blue moon get worked up enough about one pic that I’d like to print at circa 7”x9” size. Which is why I was hoping the cropping action on a 40 MP sensor would let me share acceptable quality pics of subjects even if too far away for a 23mm lens.
Thanks for your comments, much appreciated! -
for a small post card size print, a cell phone might scratch the itch enough for its convenience with the other 99% of the time to share the photos immediately with it being an internet connected device that also has embedded AI and editing capabilities.
Still, if you want a "real camera" and if you aren't really thinking about post processing images out of a camera to be part of your workflow, then I would be sure to steer you toward a camera that has good simulations embedded in it like from Fuji. Most cameras will produce a flat looking image that's very malleable to post processing but will look pretty meh if you use it straight out of camera.
-
Classy shot @Marc2706
TMax 400 takes me back to my youth. Very cool they still make it.
-
-
@Bridger in my opinion nothing beats film when you have a good natural light. And for sure it is just a mental thing but my heart is more attached to analog photos than to digital ones even though digital images can be edited that they look almost similar to film. But with film I appreciate the result more
Instagram: wick_marc
-
@Marc2706 - it does feel a little like the vinyl vs CD debate.
I do appreciate the effort required to get a perfect shot with film, given the reduced ability to post-produce the image.
I remember being happy if I got 1 or 2 good shots in a roll of 36. The cost of film and production makes the each press of the shutter more considered.
-
I bounce between a Sony A1 and a Fuji X100VI.
The Fuji caused me start carrying a camera much more than I ever did with the Sony, and as the man said, “the best camera is the one you have with you.”
There are many other reasons I think the X100 is great and why I think it helps you become a better shooter, but ultimately, if it makes you take a camera with you more places, that’s all you really need to know …and it’s just plain fun to use.
-
@Marc2706
I have my Fuji set to jpeg only, that way I can’t reframe in post. I’ve had several unusable images, but it ultimately made me a better and more thoughtful shooter. I also always use a film simulation and don’t edit my Fuji shots at all. I tried to get as close to the film experience as possible without having to deal with scanning negatives or traveling with film.
