Watches - another OCD problem

[Molle]

Seikos first divers watch was introduced in 1965. My example of the 6217-8001 (aka 62MAS) is from 1967.

[gazza61]

had this watch 30 years now ,still one of my fav dress watch.

[Molle]

@gazza61 Never scratch

[gazza61]

@Molle same as my speedy dark side of the moon,just got to be carefull not to drop them on a hard surface.

[Molle]

Seikos 2nd diver, 6215-7000. Only produced for one year, 1967. I thought the text of the M65 label was very suitable also for the watch.

[northsouthdenimguy]

5oz Dobby Cloth IHSH-358-IND and a 2004 Series D 16600

[JDelage]

IH flannel & H. Moser….

[mclaincausey]

Love love love that Moser @JDelage

[Molle]

Grand Seiko SBGR305 from 2017. First one where they ditched Seiko at the top of the dial and Grand Seiko was made a brand of its own. Titanium case and 9S68 automatic movement.

[Giles]

I'd wear that

[mclaincausey]

Yeah that’s a beauty. Simplicity wins the day. A simple “automatic” is great. I don’t need the watch to flex about its Hi Beat or Spring Drive. I can simply watch the seconds hand if I feel I need to know that for some reason. Knowing whether or not it requires a manual wind is justifiable intel to display.

[goosehd]

Really enjoying the simplicity of this one.

[JDelage]

@Molle - Lovely GS. Have you seen the new(ish) SBGW305?

[Molle]

@JDelage said in Watches - another OCD problem:

@Molle - Lovely GS. Have you seen the new(ish) SBGW305?

Not in the flesh. I have the old SBGW005 though which has the same bracelet.

[Molle]

@mclaincausey said in Watches - another OCD problem:

Yeah that’s a beauty. Simplicity wins the day. A simple “automatic” is great. I don’t need the watch to flex about its Hi Beat or Spring Drive. I can simply watch the seconds hand if I feel I need to know that for some reason. Knowing whether or not it requires a manual wind is justifiable intel to display.

This is not to your liking then I guess?
SBGC001

[mclaincausey]

@Molle haha I admire it but indeed it’s a bit much for me.

I used to be a big chronograph guy but now I’m a diver guy for mechanical watches even though I just wear a fitness watch. What timing I don’t do on my phone can usually be done with a dive bezel and I like the ruggedness and not having to worry about taking a dip and things like that.

[Molle]

@mclaincausey divers watches are my favourites. The poor man’s chrono (the turning bezel) is very useful.

[Giles]

@mclaincausey said in Watches - another OCD problem:

Knowing whether or not it requires a manual wind is justifiable intel to display.

In case you forget overnight?

[mclaincausey]

@Giles don’t overestimate my memory.

[Molle]

SRQ049 on IHM-27