Ultra Heavy Raw (UHR), AKA 21/23oz Denim

[popvulture]

Guess at this point I just need to decide which fit to go with. Been thinking 634, but 888 is a maybe. Any idea yet which cut y'all are rolling out first? One at a time, or in groups?

[Oaktavia]

@popvulture:

Guess at this point I just need to decide which fit to go with. Been thinking 634, but 888 is a maybe. Any idea yet which cut y'all are rolling out first? One at a time, or in groups?

I'm thinking 777 or 888 for me…

[AdamJ]

@popvulture It will most likely be first come, first up! We'll have no idea for a while yet though as they've just gone into production.

@Oaktavia I had the 777 on the last batch, deffo 555 this time round!

[Oaktavia]

@AdamJ:

@Oaktavia I had the 777 on the last batch, deffo 555 this time round!

I was also considering this…I have 555 in my 21oz and love 'em.

ETA is still far off, correct? As in after S/S 22? Just want to get my ducks in a row.

[Giles]

No dates on the UHR production schedule, but I'd guess well after SS…..

[Oaktavia]

Cool, cool. No rush from me…still have plenty of jeans to wear and not enough time for them.

[weftyarn]

I’m hyped. I think the UHR may be my next project pair.

[neph93]

666 for me, if the measurements work out. The nice thing about UHR is that the dims often come up a little big, and the shrinkage gives one room to play around.

[AdamJ]

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

UHR is back *for a limited time only 

[popvulture]

@neph93:

666 for me, if the measurements work out. The nice thing about UHR is that the dims often come up a little big, and the shrinkage gives one room to play around.

Per @Simon 's pre and post measurements from earlier in the thread though, it looks like these don't have too much in the way of shrink, no? I feel like this is a good thing, but it might affect your wiggle room.

[Giles]

@AdamJ:

Standard UK washing machine, 40c (104F) at 400RPM for 60mins

Tag 34 IH-777-UHR Sample

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

Any plans for a UHR jacket or anything else besides jeans? Someone is asking me on IG…

[Giles]

No, nothing else planned,  Jackets are effectively impossible to construct out of UHR for instance…..

[Filthy2123ozjunkie]

Okay thanks G 

[henry_david]

@Giles:

No, nothing else planned,  Jackets are effectively impossible to construct out of UHR for instance…..

[dasilva54]

Just saw that you guys are releasing the UHR denim again!
Man I am so happy lol! I am getting a pair in the 888 cut for sure!
My favorite denim for fades by far!

[spitfiredealer]

@popvulture:

@neph93:

666 for me, if the measurements work out. The nice thing about UHR is that the dims often come up a little big, and the shrinkage gives one room to play around.

Per @Simon 's pre and post measurements from earlier in the thread though, it looks like these don't have too much in the way of shrink, no? I feel like this is a good thing, but it might affect your wiggle room.

@Giles:

@AdamJ:

Standard UK washing machine, 40c (104F) at 400RPM for 60mins

Tag 34 IH-777-UHR Sample

I washed these on a 60 degree and got another half a inch in length shrink. Waist came in too.

[popvulture]

@spitfiredealer hell yeah — thanks for posting that, man!

That’s wild that you got that much more shrinkage. Guess cos of the agitation from the machine wash? I think the other one was a soak. This is all super useful. Cheers

[neph93]

@popvulture:

I think the other one was a soak. This is all super useful. Cheers

The recommended method with UHR is to soak  first, then wash. This because it is loomstate. The soak activates the cotton fibres and embeds the stitching, the wash gets the shrinkage out.