Unpopular opinions
-
I love that you were on a greyhound bus. That’s Americana right there.
Speaking of which, I’ve never understood why the US doesn’t have a transcontinental bullet train. We’re so behind when it comes to mass transit imo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Elon Musk agrees with you.
It would use technology that "combines a magnetic levitation train and a low pressure transit tube." He says the best way to picture it is to think of vacuum tube systems that are used in buildings to transport documents. Similar to what banks use at the drive through teller lanes. Supposedly it can go over 700 mph and he says we have all the technology needed today to make this possible.
-
I love that you were on a greyhound bus. That’s Americana right there.
Speaking of which, I’ve never understood why the US doesn’t have a transcontinental bullet train. We’re so behind when it comes to mass transit imo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because they would rather spend 8 Billion on a "Space Force"
-
^ oh my bad. I apologize to all. No more about that from me.
-
I was in LA in the summer, and in some parts of the city the smell of cannabis was pretty strong.
I caught the Greyhound from LA to Utah, and I remember the driver telling passengers that even though possession of marijuana was legal in some places, carrying it across state lines was a Federal offense, and counted as trafficking…
When it comes to that, the TSA, though a federal administration, at worst will confiscate cannabis discovered at airport security here, informing a local Denver police officer, who is unlikely to write a ticket. I saw an article that said there were I think 5 citations out of millions of travelers (and who knows how many thousands riding dirty) over a year. They really don't care here. What they care about is actual crime and running against regulations (e.g. buying over limit, illegal grows, smoking while driving or in public spaces, etc).
I wonder if there is reciprocity between states as far as where transporting medicine for patients or a stash for recreational users state to state is concerned. This would clearly not bear on federal law, but an interesting thought.
CBD, a compound in cannabis that is not psychoactive, but is anti-inflammatory, anti-seizure, and probably anti-carcinogen, with no dangerous side effects, is still classified Schedule I by the DEA. People for whom this is the most effective therapy for their malady in some cases literally have to move to a state where they can use a medicine that works for them.
-
I've heard nothing but great things about CBD oil. I have a few friends who are using the THC free CBD oil for several different ailments and they swear by it.
-
Two more anecdotes:
Some friends of mine have a daughter with Rett syndrome, a rare, congenital, debilitating neurodegenerative disorder. They tried every antiseizure medication imaginable and no relief: indeed terrible side effects instead. They placed her on CBD oil therapy and her seizures went from 12 a day to about that many a month, and recovery times are a fraction of what they were before, with no side effects.
My wife is far from being a smoker and she uses a hand cream for sore hands (maybe arthritis, not sure) that works very well: nothing else provides her relief.
To Chris's point, the research is young, but it works for certain maladies. How it works isn't understood, but it seems that it needs other cannabinoids, including THC, to work properly. So even though CBD is non-psychoactive and therapeutic, the entire plant should be de-scheduled and explored in clinical research.
-
I love that you were on a greyhound bus. That’s Americana right there.
Speaking of which, I’ve never understood why the US doesn’t have a transcontinental bullet train. We’re so behind when it comes to mass transit imo.
Because we would stop using gas and buying so many cars, imagine all the people driving cross country that would take a train instead, is always about the money, they say our train tracks are not meant for a train like that , I believe is bs.
-
This may register as an unpop: though I enjoy driving under certain circumstances, the advent of self-driving cars and the elimination of driver incompetence and recklessness is an opportunity to change the world in dramatic ways:
- networked cars would make vastly better usage of roadways and reduce traffic considerably. Think of the cars as forming trains as they coordinate, yet are free to split whenever is needed to get you to your destination
-less morbidity and mortality from car accidents
-urban landscapes and land use could be vastly improved with the elimination of parking garages
-
ability to work during commute and reduction of road rage
-
get as drunk as you like, even during transit
I'd like it if cars became sort of like Car2Go and Über mixed with real-time coordination. So, you'd call up a driverless cars just like Über and they'd take you to your destination, networked with all the other cars to do so expeditiously. Ride sharing would remain a cost saving option. The cars would be electric and programmed to return to charging bays as needed.
-
- get as drunk as you like, even during transit
Not sure they will ever allow that. In testing the people are fully sober and watching the road as normal aren't they ?
Plus there is a video I seen of one being tested and the car ran someone over dead and the tester was being filmed in car. The tester went through the legal system but it was found that they were awake, sober and watching the road but did not have reasonable time to react.
I think that is how it will go down in the future. After all you cant stop people walking onto roads suddenly and the police will want to know if the operator could have avoided it.
-
That was in Phoenix where the Uber self driving car ran over a pedestrian and killed them, if that's what you're referring to.
-
- get as drunk as you like, even during transit
Not sure they will ever allow that. In testing the people are fully sober and watching the road as normal aren't they ?
Plus there is a video I seen of one being tested and the car ran someone over dead and the tester was being filmed in car. The tester went through the legal system but it was found that they were awake, sober and watching the road but did not have reasonable time to react.
I think that is how it will go down in the future. After all you cant stop people walking onto roads suddenly and the police will want to know if the operator could have avoided it.
Yep probably drivers will at least in the near term be the failsafe–I thought of that post post.
There will be a lot of alarmism as more self-driving cars kill people, but they will inevitably outperform human beings in that regard.
-
I caught the Greyhound from LA to Utah
I once rode a Greyhound from Flagstaff to Las Vegas, and two things stand out about the experience. First, in the bus station there was a large wall clock with a sign directly affixed to the face that said, "Yes, this is the correct time." Second, a guy got kicked off in Laughlin after he started a fight, thus missing his party in Vegas to celebrate his release from prison.
-
I caught the Greyhound from LA to Utah
I once rode a Greyhound from Flagstaff to Las Vegas, and two things stand out about the experience. First, in the bus station there was a large wall clock with a sign directly affixed to the face that said, "Yes, this is the correct time." Second, a guy got kicked off in Laughlin after he started a fight, thus missing his party in Vegas to celebrate his release from prison.
That is classic.
-
I feel like it's a perfect encapsulation of both Greyhound and Las Vegas.
-
Wasn’t some guy decapitated on a Grey Hound awhile back? That was enough to keep me from taking the Grey Hound forever [emoji107]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Waaaaaaay crazier than just a decapitation.
But that was in Canada. You know what those people are like…
-
Waaaaaaay crazier than just a decapitation.
But that was in Canada. You know what those people are like…
Yep, that’s the guy
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
i'm not sure how i feel against self driving cars.
at the moment i'm well against it. and not just from a car enthusiast background. but self driving cars do create a lot of legal what ifs and extensions into things that we have no precedence for. you can take away the human side of driving and yet technology do fail in certain scenarios. not to mention it's only the driving you're taking the human input away from. you can't remove human input or error on the sidewalk, cross junctions and stuff.
it creates this new aspect as to 'who's to blame' as you cannot legally charge AIs at the moment. they're not 'a person' in the eyes of the law.
