IH-816-GRY - Grey Whipcord Work Pants
-
Yup, won't be getting these sadly, Hem too big for me.
-
It's a real shame they keep getting wider… Size 33, brown => olive => grey: 8.3, 8.5, 8.9" legopening...
I noticed the wider leg opening too on these. I shall ask for the 34 with the smallest hem.
Yep, same here with the 35 since I want the smallest hem but need the 13+ thigh measurement.
-
So nice.
-
I have a 36 in the green, but they are snug and I am finding pretty much no stretch in these. The 36s here are even snugger in the waist (by .5 inches) than the greens. Given the sizes between 36 and 38 are almost identical except for the waist, I am looking at a 38
How many 38s did you all get? Are you all seeing any variance within sizes? (ie a 38 with slightly smaller waist?)
-
Sorry, I should know better and just wait till they are up for sale and live. I’ve just been anticipating these since I heard they were coming and the pics posted make them look so good.
I can always wait to order them and hash out sizing once I’ve paid….I know you fellas are busy
-
Yes, there is certainly the usual variance within each tag size. Check your PMs for more info.
-
I`m already hooked … ???
-
Regarding the Hem width, I have just measured every single pair and updated the sizing chart with the average for each tag size. Overall they have gone down by either .1 or .2 of an inch but there is the usual variance so if you need something specific just add a note when checking out.
As a quick comparison here's how three tag sizes compare through the leg width. Two pairs of each tag size measured (stock allowing):
So a more noticeable difference in the tag40s but for each tag size the widest is in the GRYs. @Giles will communicate this to JPHQ to ensure this doesn't continue.
-
You da man @Winchy
-
FWIW my Olives in tag size 34 have an 8.5" hem vs the 8.9" hem shown on the greys.
-
Copped a tag 35 and asked for the smallest hem. These will be worn regularly.
