2016 - Spring/Summer Pipeline
-
21oz signature denim is coming as raw, really? OMG! That'd be awesome. What cut?
I feel like it should be in the signature cut, the 634. And definitely the 666, but 634 first.
Since my original recipe 634S are at Indigo Proof getting refurbished, I've come to the realization that I should never be without at least one pair of 634 jeans.
-
@Chris I'd go with 634 too for the comfort.Finding difficult to wear slim jeans in heavy weight denim.Only hope for smaller leg opening
-
Well, Giles did say he's working on it for a retailer, so maybe you'll get lucky @Oleg, and it will be a Self Edge 633. That way you get that smaller leg opening…
-
@Chris That be great.Well,I've got an issue with the way Self edge measure and size guide ,it's so uninformative and inaccurate,that I'd need a help to determine a size I'm after.
-
Sorry guys, but I'm confused here and I hope someone can clear this up for me.
So we are saying that there is a 21oz raw fabric coming out, by "raw" do we mean unsanforized or loomstate?
Also, as stated above there already is a 21oz unsanforized fabric (the UHR 21/23oz) so is this fabric we are referring to the new version of the UHR fabric that's being created on the new loom that Haraki found? Or is this the flagship fabric that is just unsanforized? Or is this a completely new 21oz fabric??
lol..I'm so confused. Sorry fellas, just trying to clear this up.
-
Think it is the flagship 21oz unsanforized
-
@den213:
Has there ever been the 21 oz as unwashed? Would be pretty amazing!
No. But I'm sorting out a raw version for a retailer, and I'll probably use some myself….
Based on this, I'm guessing that it's the flagship 21 oz denim, only unsanforized and without the fade resisting treatment. That means it would probably be about 20 oz preshrunk weight.
Though Giles will correct us if we're completely off base and speculating wildly…
-
Are we going to see 777-SII at some point of the spring?
-
@Chris That be great.Well,I've got an issue with the way Self edge measure and size guide ,it's so uninformative and inaccurate,that I'd need a help to determine a size I'm after.
Dude. Glad to know I'm not the only one. I think the 633 seems great, in theory, but unless I get to go to self edge in person, I feel lost.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Definitely not the only one.
-
Definitely not the only one.
Not to get away from the intent of this thread but this happened to me with the LHT 301. The thigh in particular came in borderline snug and then very uncomfortable after a soak. I sold them at a big loss.
The 633s was a little safer bet being a familiar denim and somewhat familiar cut. They turned out alright thankfully.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
From Boss talk:
Not sure wether it's a 20 or the reincarnation, but I think the block checks are smaller than on the 20.
-
I can't see the pic @Max Power^^
-
Hm, worked fo me yesterday. Sorry.
-
You can't do this with Haraki's Blog:
img width=500 height=366]http://blog-imgs-35-origin.fc2.com/s/h/i/shin3155/0112-1s.jpg[/img
(leading [ and trailing ] left out on purpose….)
The link is dynamic and changes.
You have to download the image and upload it back to the imaging provider you use....
-
Dam it's going to be a expensive Spring!!
-
G, I know you addressed this somewhere, but are all the new short sleeves coming with the modified, smaller sleeve opening?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
