IH-1955-UHR - Ultra Heavy Raw 1955 Cut

[Snowy]

@Seul:

These really are anti-modern grampa jeans… I kinda get 'm and love 'm but not sure whether they're for me... Fabric is amazeballs though...

100% agree with all of that. I enjoy wearing mine, and wear the shit out of them (should have evo shots up in a few more weeks).

[Anesthetist]

I like em on you Seul. But if you dont, shoot me a PM.

[Seul]

Cheers. Maybe I should get the 666-UHR but do I really need two almost identical cuts (666-XHS)?.. These really are a different cut ànd denim… Maybe I will keep 'm...  :-\

[JCMx800]

I have 5 pairs of 634´s… And the next one is not far away

[EastWest]

Seul, keep'm. When evo'd and softened up they'll look great, and o'course by that time gramps jeans could be high on your list man!

[Klaus]

Hello everyone,
The pictures are from a tag size 28 with one soak and 20 days of use at the day of the pictures, now with 36 days the measures are: 
Waist 28,5
Front rise 11,5
Rear rise 15,5
Thigh 11
knee 8,5
Hem 7,125 (7 - 1/4)
Inseam 35

[JohnM]

Seul, the 1955-UHR looks good on you.

The fit isn't for everyone, but if you have relatively big hips and legs (as I do) and find other cuts a little trim below the waist, the 1955 works really well.  It is a different cut, no doubt.  For anyone considering them, don't size up.  As long as the waist is OK there's a lot of room down below.  I wear a 34 in the 1955-UHR but usually have to size up to 36 in other IH models just to get the hips and thighs to be comfortable.

John

[mpukas]

Fella's - thanks for the responses and fit pics. Sorry I missed these posts over the last few weeks.

Seul & Klaus, fit pics look great. I don't think they look too grampa-like. With some break-in time they'll be stellar. These are now at the top of my list for a next pair. I'm still happy with my current 634-XHS, but I'm starting to exercise heavily again, and I can feel them getting snugger around the tighs and hips. A slightly looser cut & higher rise is appealing to me. Cheers! mpp

[Winchy]

Sizes 30, 31, 32, 34 & 40 now available again.

[Sreeni]

And I thought I won't see these again

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

[FormulaPfaff]

Got them pretty dirty so I figured I'd take some shots before I wash them.  I love these things.
~6months

DSC_7142 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7157 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7166 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7167 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7182 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7202 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7221 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

DSC_7236 by Gregory Pfaff, on Flickr

[Appfaff]

Damn @FormulaPfaff , first you kick my butt in the Bro vs Bro IHSH-75 fade off and now you have a leg up on me with the UHR. Will you ever let me catch up?

Beyond awesome - way to go with the photos and the fades!

[FormulaPfaff]

@Appfaff thanks dude! I can't wait to see your UHRs when you get them in. Now is actually a great time to catch up on the IHSH-75 since I'm working on my sugar cane shirt at the moment…

[Seul]

Pfaff: great stuff mate!..

[Appfaff]

@FormulaPfaff - I try to wear my 75 at least once a week, but it still dosn't get the love it deserves.

Make sure you post photos after you wash your  1955UHR - the contrast should be amazing!

[Ali Ajemi]

[Ali Ajemi]

1955 cut is great for people with big thigh.. very comfortable

[Bob]

The pockets should be scaled smaller for smaller sizes. Too big here.
@Klaus:

Hello everyone,
The pictures are from a tag size 28 with one soak and 20 days of use at the day of the pictures, now with 36 days the measures are: 
Waist 28,5
Front rise 11,5
Rear rise 15,5
Thigh 11
knee 8,5
Hem 7,125 (7 - 1/4)
Inseam 35

[Anesthetist]

I think once they settle in, they aren't so obvious.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dion]

Great work @Ali Ajemi !