ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR
-
Looks un-trademarked from a quick search anyhow;
http://www.trademarkia.com/company-flat-head-co-ltd-450566-page-1-2(Interesting to note TFH are trademarking their arcs)
-
flying whell it is, such an original jean . . . well the second or third coming of such a groundbreaking fabric wanted a patch that did the same with it's content. no harm or foul imho of folks voicing why the like/don't like it. these jeans would do well with a rat skin patch that had a superimposed image of my testicles with wings attached on either side say ing "superheaby" to give it some authentic feeling, hahahaha.
unfortunately for the rest.of you I'm still subscribed to this space will see.what else.happens
-
hey.snowy.didnt Iron Heart.do the same with their arcs and W in recent months?
& I.try.to never tell folks how to feel it's a very.personal undertaking exposing something you careabout before iy is complete. i'm sure tje folks in the crafts thread would say f
ck.off if I.told.them to change their art. I see no difference in this and so always give G$ a pass when ha acts salty towards comments or the community. -
^MM I couldn't find anything trademarked in the US using the same service, not sure (I checked before posting initially).
In the past we've changed things when suggesting things (I seem to recall multiple iterations of a recent VO design), I don't think there's ever any harm in raising suggested, sometimes it's a No. I like this patch, but don't buy denim for patches anyhow. Patchless, now there's a design!
-
my positions remsins the same, very well done design but for the uniqueness of the product not my 1st choice, I've no alternative or suggestions & understand we rocking with the patch as is. I don't do dogpiles.or try to compare different brands. Gave my thoughts & can't believe im saying it but seul hit this one dead on, the cut will dictate.I got a pair of heavy busters that were a great idea on paper but once I put them on despite the multiple pairs of busters I've worn it was a no go. fingers crossed the 666s come out just right. . .
ok I' m out Im.spraying around my house with hot sauce to deter a certain night watchmen from coming around
-
are you saying what's the big deal? thats the kind of thinking that has the world in decline, hahahaha
it's fun Bags, that baby got you up too early
-
Interesting…
-
G, i know "it is what it is" But i think that most of us (well me anyway) werent trying to compare the new design to TFH or even saying that its "their" design, just simply bringing up the similarity incase it was "overlooked" by IH. I def wouldnt want to see my favourite brand upset/embarassed after its too late. ie("aww shit, i didnt realize another brand used a similar design for their jeans. FECKIN BALLS!!") You know what im saying G? Its more of us just havin your back bro
-
Yeah, that's certainly where I was coming from. As I said before that's why I mentioned it, as an FYI just in case this was an oversight that would be regretted later. Not because i care about the patch.
