IH-634S - 21oz Selvedge Denim Straight Cut Jeans - Indigo
-
The 9634Z is effectively the same cut, but it does have a zipper fly.
http://www.ironheart.co.uk/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=100
-
BOT what about these?:http://www.ironheart.co.uk/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=100
-
haha too slow
-
Thanks for the answers guys. I actually have a pair of the IH-9634z…they are bit big for me after some weight loss.
Was more wondering if the cut would ever come in a denim like the SBG used for the Beatle Busters....Is it a possible to get a pair of IH-634-S with a longer inseam? I can only wear mine with boots--they look a bit too prim (basically a mid-break) with regular low-cut shoes.
-
I'm thinking about picking up a pair of 634s for Christmas this year, but I have kind of a dumb question so bear with me. I currently own a pair of DC4s and although I love them, I was looking for a slightly fuller cut and slightly higher rise. I sized down for my DC4s and I'm glad I did and probably will again for this pair (for the waist if nothing else). So, my question is even though I've looked at the sizing on both cuts, are the 634s going to be visually different enough from the DC4s to warrant owning both OR should I save a little more and get something completely different like the 1955s?
-
if you are going for a completely different cut i would get the 55s . . . but that's just me. put your question in the small question thread for more "traction" as G likes to say.
-
That is why I went with another brand instead of buying a pair of "oversized" Busters (33 instead of 32)… Already have 634S y'see... I do however think that the DC and the 634S jeans are different enough... If you really want something completely different, just buy a skirt...
Kilts, man, they're called kilts!
Here's an awesome utilikilt that lets you hold tons of beer bottles: http://www.utilikilts.com/
-
I'm thinking about picking up a pair of 634s for Christmas this year, but I have kind of a dumb question so bear with me. I currently own a pair of DC4s and although I love them, I was looking for a slightly fuller cut and slightly higher rise. I sized down for my DC4s and I'm glad I did and probably will again for this pair (for the waist if nothing else). So, my question is even though I've looked at the sizing on both cuts, are the 634s going to be visually different enough from the DC4s to warrant owning both OR should I save a little more and get something completely different like the 1955s?
I'm no expert, but I would recommend measuring your current favorite jeans, DC4s, and comparing that to the 1955S (which has a higher rise than the 634S), and then comparing it to the 634S. Make sure you measure your DC4s the same way Giles measures IH jeans.
-
simon & paul you two aren't answering this guys question (imho) you are just saying what you like/don't like. is the cut different enough is the question
jeez
-
@Monday
Oh, my bad, I thought I had addressed his question by asking him to measure his current fave and look for something that G has that is slightly bigger than that, where he wants it bigger (rise).
You're right, though, looking back he was asking for a comparison between the DC4s and the 634S. I can't help there, then, sorry, I don't have a pair of DC4s.
Hope I didn't confuse you further
-
no worries paul, i just know when i have a question & don't get an answer i get a little bit frustrated.
seul answered the question, get a kilt
-
then we´ll try again
I was looking for a slightly fuller cut and slightly higher rise.
then you´ve just found you dream jeans. have both and the 634b is the dc4 with a higher rise (just a normal rise, dc4 is just ridiculous low..) and fuller all around cut (not baggy though).
-> go for them!
I sized down for my DC4s and I'm glad I did and probably will again for this pair (for the waist if nothing else).
so you sized down from your normal jeans size in your dc4 and are fine with it - just to unterstand?
if so, i believe you could size down 1 more in the 634 (1 size, 34 ->33 , not 2 ..) but you don´t have to.
