IH-1955S
-
thanks guys. had a whole day with these on and still loving it.
i know the denim is the same but this feels a little different, very very slightly more hairy and fluffy. most likely
just the opposite season form when my 634S denim was woven [you would be surprised how season can affect a vintage loom]these are differently too long for me so will take them up when i have time.
the construction on the 55 is the same as the 634S with a few minor details.the sewn in belt loop
fully lined back pockets
the US 43200G was in perfect tention with this lot
-
thanks Jimmy
haha…i was expecting. more flicks
don't understand why no one is posting their 55s :-\
i have a few more interesting facts/details and pics to share but will only do it if another person post their 55
-
BAM! alright that got me out of bed
couple of interesting facts. [neither make it better or worse]
reason unknown to me the lapseamer used for these is a different machine to the 634S and the 25oz [the only two other IH jeans i've seen in person] not only is the machine different but the cotton
-
Fact-tasctic info Jimmy….great products deserve this much analysis.
-
finally someone has the nuts to post some pics…1000thanks mate.
fit looks great...pretty high backrise on these though. not easy to rock, but you`re doing great...
I guess I have nuts now!!;)
What do you think Jimmy, you think sizing down to a 33 was a good choice?
-
That's a greast fit there TinMan.
-
Thanks everyone, I really like these. I am glad G and Areo did the collab. I hope they make a rerun or a raw version.
Jimmy to answer your question they feel great! I also thought the 34 was a little loose.
At first the 33's were a tiny bit snug, when bending, sitting, or squatting. Now they are nice and comfy. We all know the 21oz will strtetch and conform to you. Thats one reason I love the IH denim.