139ind, 02ind, 289red, PT, 555S-19ib, Viberg

139ind, 50ind, 234cam, PT, 555-19ib, Viberg

526L, TG, 666S-19L, Viberg

A-A, 289grn, PT, 720kha, Viberg

Wishing everyone here a healthy and prosperous 2026!

309pur, PT, 666-19L, Wesco

365ind, PT, 555S-19ib, Anderson Bean

A relaxing Saturday morning : 219ind, Orslow, OSB

360grn, PT, 555S-SLB, Anderson Bean

Albini (Italy), PT, 721nav, OSB

02ind, 248ind, PT, 814ind, Viberg

256V, 33T, TG, 666S-19L, Viberg

@hammertoe1 I own one of these in size XS and I second everything you state in your first paragraph. I look forward to an IH type II in 21oz if it should go into production.

@markus_berlin_ so blessed - congrats!

2526V, 33blk, TG, 666S-19L, Viberg

@Rangadello I second what you so elequently put into words and feel very similar and would express similar if I were even half the orator that you are. Thanks for that heartfelt feedback that not only applies to yourself.

9526V, 33od, TG, 666S-19L, Viberg

With the three FW26 shirts that are released or being released thus far all having what appears to be atypical western shirt dimensions and more typical of work shirts, my bad in misinterpreting this along with the comment on regrading the sample resizing / tweaking to be more than it was literally noted. Thank you @alex for kindly setting me straight in that these recent shirt releases are just the normal of some shirts running atypical from the typical dimensions and not a new normal.

256V, 33ind, TG, 666S-19L, Viberg

The work shirts are a shorter, wider, roomier cut. Now the recalibrated western shirt dimensions are running similar to the work shirts. I personally found IH based on their slim fitting western style that were long enough to tuck and were one of the few brands that provided a size XS and the typical chest measurement around 19.5-20.0” worked well along with the slim waist and opening dimensions so not a lot of excess fabric when tucking. Again, hoping this is temporary resizing for the westerns - fingers crossed.

The other thing to note with the recalibrated western shirt dimensions in terms of overall length (if they should all continue as the recent FW26 releases), this shortened length leaves zero room for potential shrinkage when washing even if wearing as untucked depending - particularly for anyone taller than me at 5’-6”. Sleeve length is another item to note, but this is also a factor of the shoulder dimension which appears to had somewhat increased for the given sizes. But the bigger shoulder dimension also will make the chest wear larger of which that dimension increased by approx. 1.5” per given size. Fingers crossed that future releases trend back towards what has been a given for the western shirt typical dimensions over the past 6+ years I’ve been purchasing.