IH-824-BLK - 21oz Black Wabash Single Knee Logger Jeans
-
Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.
-
Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.
Great fit. Probably a good plan to go with the extra length. The 12oz wabash shrinks in the wash, incrementally, I suspect this will too.
-
The cut … is like a 1955S with a low front rise and less tapper.
More like a roomy 634S. You know you can run a compare on the website:
-
Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.
How do you like the fit? I'm used to regular/slim taper and scared that this would be way too roomy
-
@chubacca Personally, I do. However, I generally I prefer a "relaxed" fit and assiduously avoid anything described as "slim" or "skinny." My only other IH pants are the 1955S, because until recently they were the only ones where the thighs were big enough at my waist measurement. I bought the brown whipchord work pants, but they were too snug in the top block, even though the thigh was workable.
I wouldn't object to a bit more taper from the knee down on these, but I like them as they are. As Giles said, they are a roomier 634, so if you like something with a taper and something slim, these are pretty much the opposite. They are amazing, though.
-
Very nice. People are gonna be sad they slept on these
-
X post from WAYWT. Some more wabash love.
-
Sad that these are extinct, but glad I have them. And one of the first pairs I had to wear again in my rotation
