We know you love IH, but where do you think we can improve?

[jdl1279]

Eh, not all of my thoughts can be winners. A special "fuck off" to whomever loused up the stack option though. Like I said before, the idea just came from impatience and a bit of frugality.

[Giles]

Pre-orders will not happen….

[madmonday]

it aint a thing @jdl1279 I have more bad ideas than good, plus one of those really successful folks said something along the lines of all bad ideas are just practice runs at good ideas  or something like that . . . I'm paraphrasing here, hahahahaha

[sabergirl]

Wait, what happened with the stacks? We can't stack anymore?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Giles]

Yes you still can.

BUT we used to put stuff aside for people (we called it stacking then too) who wanted something.  We asked for no money up front, expecting that they would pay for it when they asked us to ship it with something else.  We got let down so many times, we had to stop it…..

[sabergirl]

Aha. Understood. Thanks

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jdl1279]

What I wanted was directly opposite. LOL I want to pay for things you don't have yet. I'm grabbing some extant items too though. So I can always bundle those if the shorts come in separate from the others

[Giles]

But what happens when we do get them and a) The sizing is not what we expected or b) you have changed shape or c) decide you don't want it after all?  Yes all of those things happened too.

The only times we did preorders in any large way was with the last two sets of DWC jeans.  We had to make double what was pre-ordered each time, so that we were certain that we would have enough to satisfy everyone when actual measurements were published.

That's why when we released the DWCxUHR we also released the IHxB01xUHR.  Did we want to release a 100 pairs of IHxB01xUHR?  No, but we had to make 200 pairs of the DWC cut to make sure that everyone who had pre-ordered the DWC, go what they eventually wanted….

[jdl1279]

I completely understand the reasoning and when thinking on it can come up with even more reasons why you shouldn't. I appreciate the feedback none the less. I'll impatiently wait my turn like everyone else

[Dion]

I hope there will be a third IH-DWC-pair next year…

[Nomad]

I would like to see less of a scoop on the hems of the workshirts, a straighter cut would be more suited I think.

[tmg]

^ that's a good point actually since many work shirts are worn loose rather than tucked, and could also be applied to the UHF's, both western and work cuts, since they're probably never tucked due to the thickness

[UnTucked]

I think in 2016, no man should have to wear a t-shirt with an actual "tag" in the neck. Screen printed or heat pressed tags in the shirts would be a great improvement.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Seul]

^Hear hear!..

[Black Orchid]

^ seconded

[spitfiredealer]

Yep I got myself a seam ripper and take them off most times.

Pretty sure my TW's t-shirts were printed in rather than a label.

[Seul]

Yes they are indeed.

[manufc10]

@UnTucked:

I think in 2016, no man should have to wear a t-shirt with an actual "tag" in the neck. Screen printed or heat pressed tags in the shirts would be a great improvement.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quoted for truth.

[Finkster]

@UnTucked:

I think in 2016, no man should have to wear a t-shirt with an actual "tag" in the neck. Screen printed or heat pressed tags in the shirts would be a great improvement.

Complete agreement and +1 for a printed alternative

[A Former User]

Way way ahead of y'all. Been asking for more than four years  :o…. We got them on some triple works tees and some ihsh's, but that has been it thus far.  Here's hoping....

@adam313:

@adam313:

what about Tag-less T-Shirts?

Or maybe t-shirts with no tag?