Watches - another OCD problem

[Molle]

@mclaincausey said in Watches - another OCD problem:

Yeah that’s a beauty. Simplicity wins the day. A simple “automatic” is great. I don’t need the watch to flex about its Hi Beat or Spring Drive. I can simply watch the seconds hand if I feel I need to know that for some reason. Knowing whether or not it requires a manual wind is justifiable intel to display.

This is not to your liking then I guess?
SBGC001

[mclaincausey]

@Molle haha I admire it but indeed it’s a bit much for me.

I used to be a big chronograph guy but now I’m a diver guy for mechanical watches even though I just wear a fitness watch. What timing I don’t do on my phone can usually be done with a dive bezel and I like the ruggedness and not having to worry about taking a dip and things like that.

[Molle]

@mclaincausey divers watches are my favourites. The poor man’s chrono (the turning bezel) is very useful.

[Giles]

@mclaincausey said in Watches - another OCD problem:

Knowing whether or not it requires a manual wind is justifiable intel to display.

In case you forget overnight?

[mclaincausey]

@Giles don’t overestimate my memory.

[Molle]

SRQ049 on IHM-27

[mclaincausey]

Speaking of Seiko, I only wear a Garmin smartwatch these days but I do love this crazy chunky diver.

[Molle]

@mclaincausey Kinetic, gave one of those 8 years ago to a boy friend of one of my daughters.

[Mizmazzle]

@Molle that’s a beauty right there!

[68degreesorless]

My first vintage buy. I could see getting hooked. Thanks @Molle for the inspiration and guidance.

[Molle]

@68degreesorless Looks like a perfect specimen. Great choice.

[Molle]

I really like the Seiko mechanical chronographs from the early 70s. This one, a 7016-8001, from 1973 tops my list. In a very nice and small case Seiko managed to fit the following:

• automatic movement
• 12h column wheel chronograph
• combined chrono minutes and hours sub dial at 6 ( > 30 years ahead of Patek who did the same on their Natulis 5980).
• hours
• minutes
• day
• date

And, on top of that, it looks great.
Nothing short of brilliant!

[DeeDee85]

@Molle May I ask your thoughts on the SJE093? I previously owned the SLA017 and loved the overall look of it but the thickness of it and and slightly out of proportion shape when side by side with the original 62MAS eventually led to me letting it go. Now Seiko have rectified these niggles, do you think it’s worth giving the newer one a go?

[Luijim78]

@Molle wonderful Lord, a dream of mine forever ...congratulations

[Molle]

@Luijim78 🥰

[Molle]

@DeeDee85 I also have the SLA017 and when the SJE093 I just had to have it. It is much closer to the original in all dimensions and as a bonus the 017 bracelet fits. In the pile pic you have, from the bottom; SLA037, SLA017, 6217, SJE093

[DeeDee85]

@Molle thank you so much for your detailed response, I think I perhaps need to track one down.. I stupidly missed the boat when it was released

[Anesthetist]

[gazza61]

@Anesthetist what a lovely classic watch.

[Bill C]

Can I ask you watch guys for some advice? I bought a handwound watch with an ETA 6498 movement about eight years ago - cost me about £700. The manufacturer recommends a service every 5 years, and I was meaning to get this done. I haven’t worn it much recently but have wound it fairly regularly. It’s just stopped working (winder turns but nothing happens - seen thru glass back). A reputable local repairer has looked at it in person and quoted £200 for a full service.

I’m unsure whether to cut my losses and eBay it as in need of repair, or shell out the £200. I’d be reluctant to invest £200 every five years, but is this to be expected with this type of watch?

Many thanks - Bill