• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart - The Future

    IH-1955S-142od - 14oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Jeans - Indigo Overdyed Black

    Bottoms
    15
    24
    1.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • goosehdG
      goosehd
      Mod Squad
      @JohnM
      Joined:

      @JohnM essentially yes. They may tighten up slightly from a wash, but not shrink. Any tightness is quickly negated by a wear.

      Edit: Yes they will stretch and probably an inch. It’s not an exact science.

      “our policy of no discussions regarding politics, religion, asparagus, and other controversial issues.” - Andrew

      last edited by goosehd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • J
        JohnM
        Raw and Unwashed
        Joined:

        ^ Thanks, yes, I've learned that it's always best to trust measurements over tagged size. What I found interesting about my 888s-21OD experience is that it seemed the OD process tightened everything up a bit, not just the waist but legs too. So sizing up worked well. That said, the posted measurements for the 1955s-142OD look a little more generous, so I'll just let the staff know what I'm looking for, rather than focus on the tag.

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • R
          Ral1121
          Raw and Unwashed
          Joined:

          Question on these. The leather patch, does it allow for a belt to pass through it or is it completely sewn down like the 18oz vintage denim.

          I prefer to be able to use the patch as a belt loop

          last edited by JordJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JordJ
            Jord
            Haraki san Expert
            @Ral1121
            Joined:

            @Ral1121 Keep in mind these are the 14oz and typically don't have that feature... But not sure

            edit: After looking at the picture on the product page, looks like it's sewn in like they always do.

            edit AGAIN, i think I need glasses because I can't tell 😃 someone with better eyesight can chime in....

            last edited by Jord R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GilesG
              Giles
              IHUK Crew
              Joined:

              14oz never has a belt-thru patch

              "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • R
                Ral1121
                Raw and Unwashed
                @Jord
                Joined:

                @Jord lol I was having the same issues. I could not tell but @Giles has spoken. Thanks for the response

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • R
                  Ral1121
                  Raw and Unwashed
                  Joined:

                  One more question for those that wear this cut vs 888.

                  I have only ever tried 888s and am strongly considering the 1955 and from the compare tool the look for the most part very similar but when comparing recent measurements of 888s to these is seems they have a little more room in the thigh then the 888s. It looks like a lot of 888s have been more on the slightly narrower side then compared to previous releases of the 888.

                  For those that wear both, how do these compare to the 888s?

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Y
                    yannis
                    Haraki san Expert
                    Joined:

                    Higher front rise and from thigh to knee the 1955 is more straight so you will have more leg room. Where the taper on the 888's starts a couple of inches from the crotch, the 1955 stays straight similar to a 634 and tapers below the knee to hem.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • harleylawhornH
                      harleylawhorn
                      The Unwoven
                      Joined:

                      Excited for these. 👀 have a sizing question if anyone wants to chime in. I comfortably were a 33” waist measurement. I could wear a touch smaller but not too much. Would you go with the 31.9 and hope for the one inch of stretch or go with the 33.3 and hope it doesn’t get too loose in the waist? Or is this a pass because it won’t work. I have have a 32.5” 634 that eventually stretched to to a 33; that works well for reference.

                      The sun shines not on us but in us.
                      J. Muir

                      last edited by goosehdG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • goosehdG
                        goosehd
                        Mod Squad
                        @harleylawhorn
                        Joined:

                        @harleylawhorn the most I ever go under is about .5” depending on the fabric.

                        Anything else and it may be too much.

                        “our policy of no discussions regarding politics, religion, asparagus, and other controversial issues.” - Andrew

                        last edited by goosehd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright Iron Heart 2025.