• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    New Iron Heart Website - Live Now - Feedback and Bug Report Here Please!

    Shrinking a IH UHF

    The Resource Centre
    9
    17
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      defnaru
      Raw and Unwashed
      Joined:

      Would like to shrink my UHF a little and was hoping to see what the recommended process was if anyone can help. Thanks.

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • zhivagoZ
        zhivago
        Raw and Unwashed
        Joined:

        Hot wash and hot dryer will sort you out. Depending on the amount of shrinking your looking for adjust your heat and spin rate accordingly. Just remember once you shrink it, it's not coming back…

        Zhivago

        MM: "we all got to start somewhere"

        G: "Never once did he bitch, moan or complain.  He just motivated the team and got on with it"

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • neph93N
          neph93
          見習いボス
          Joined:

          @defnaru:

          Would like to shrink my UHF a little and was hoping to see what the recommended process was if anyone can help. Thanks.

          Take it easy. They can shrink meaningfully and too much heat will shrink them a lot and even warp the fabric.

          I’d start with a 60C machine wash on low spin. Then air dry. Take measurements before and after. Then, if you need more you can introduce the drier on the next round.

          One more thing, be aware that the material shrinks proportional to the span of fabric so you lose most on the length of the body and the arms. If that is what you want, great, if not you can tug hard along the seams of the shirt while it is drying to mitigate a little of the shrinkage.

          “Some of those that work forces
          Are the same that burn crosses”

          • Virginia Woolf
          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • hajdukH
            hajduk
            啓蒙家
            Joined:

            Yes. Really pay attention to the general proportion of the shrinking. Almost no chance that you can get a proportionate result. Shoulders, arms meas. can go totally bananas 😉

            Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

            "Ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have" James Baldwin.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • zhivagoZ
              zhivago
              Raw and Unwashed
              Joined:

              Definitely go easy, I guess I never really considered going above a 40c wash and then checking in before doing something else like the dryer. I have no doubt you could do serious damage if you go at it very hard at all. Listen to neph not me[emoji23]

              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Zhivago

              MM: "we all got to start somewhere"

              G: "Never once did he bitch, moan or complain.  He just motivated the team and got on with it"

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                defnaru
                Raw and Unwashed
                Joined:

                thanks guys, I'll try sometime this week and update on how it went just incase anyone was interested.

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • neph93N
                  neph93
                  見習いボス
                  Joined:

                  @defnaru:

                  I'll … update on how it went just incase anyone was interested.

                  Please do that, it is always useful. Best of luck!

                  “Some of those that work forces
                  Are the same that burn crosses”

                  • Virginia Woolf
                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Bfd70B
                    Bfd70
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    Joined:

                    Sell the shirt in the market place. Buy a smaller size.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jimmer_5
                      Haraki san Student
                      Joined:

                      @neph93:

                      @defnaru:

                      Would like to shrink my UHF a little and was hoping to see what the recommended process was if anyone can help. Thanks.

                      Take it easy. They can shrink meaningfully and too much heat will shrink them a lot and even warp the fabric.

                      I’d start with a 60C machine wash on low spin. Then air dry. Take measurements before and after. Then, if you need more you can introduce the drier on the next round.

                      One more thing, be aware that the material shrinks proportional to the span of fabric so you lose most on the length of the body and the arms. If that is what you want, great, if not you can tug hard along the seams of the shirt while it is drying to mitigate a little of the shrinkage.

                      Neph, can you please clarify this?  Are you saying they tend to shrink more in length than in width?

                      I have a really nice IHSH-181-GRY in a 3XL that is a little large in the chest, but a full inch too long in the arms.  I tried a 3XL because some of the 2XLs are close fitting, but this one is actually bordering on too large.

                      I'm curious if it's considered to be sacrilege to shrink one of the larger UHFs as they seem to be pretty rare?  I'm not completely opposed to selling or trading it, but I haven't made up my mind on that front.

                      The sleeves on this one are a true 28" with a 19.5" shoulder, so I think they'll be too long for most people.  I have long arms and 27" is usually right for me.

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • neph93N
                        neph93
                        見習いボス
                        Joined:

                        @jimmer_5:

                        Neph, can you please clarify this?  Are you saying they tend to shrink more in length than in width?

                        Cotton fabric is funny stuff, but generally speaking, it shrinks proportionally. All other things being equal, a square piece of fabric will shrink the same amount in all dimensions.

                        Shirts are not square. The longer dimensions will shrink proportionately more than shorter ones. So the length of the body and arms will shrink more than the chest and shoulders.

                        “Some of those that work forces
                        Are the same that burn crosses”

                        • Virginia Woolf
                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • neph93N
                          neph93
                          見習いボス
                          Joined:

                          As for sacrilege, deliberately shrinking UHF’s had a long, fine tradition around these parts. Plus, it is your shirt, so you can do whatever you like with it [emoji1]

                          “Some of those that work forces
                          Are the same that burn crosses”

                          • Virginia Woolf
                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • mclaincauseyM
                            mclaincausey
                            見習いボス
                            Joined:

                            @neph93:

                            All other things being equal, a square piece of fabric will shrink the same amount in all dimensions.

                            Shirts are not square. The longer dimensions will shrink proportionately more than shorter ones. So the length of the body and arms will shrink more than the chest and shoulders.

                            I find this a bit surprising, @neph93 . Depending upon the weave of the fabric, the tension and… I guess density? (amount of fibers in a given length of a yarn) of the warp and weft can vary considerably. So, there would normally be more tension in the warp than the weft, so I would expect the weft to shrink and expand more readily--this would be directionally-variable shrinkage. Perhaps in practice this really isn't an issue--maybe the relatively easier expansion of the weft versus the warp offsets its easier shrinkage? But I always assumed that's why you get roping and similar effects when you expose fabrics to shrinkage. And of course different tensions are applied to different directions when the garment is stored and worn too, impacting how it will stretch back out--gravity in one direction, your body perhaps in another...

                            Think it, be it.

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • J
                              jimmer_5
                              Haraki san Student
                              Joined:

                              Cotton fabric is funny stuff, but generally speaking, it shrinks proportionally. All other things being equal, a square piece of fabric will shrink the same amount in all dimensions.

                              Shirts are not square. The longer dimensions will shrink proportionately more than shorter ones. So the length of the body and arms will shrink more than the chest and shoulders.

                              @neph93:

                              As for sacrilege, deliberately shrinking UHF’s had a long, fine tradition around these parts. Plus, it is your shirt, so you can do whatever you like with it [emoji1]

                              Thank you Neph, this makes sense.  In this case, it would be perfect if it shrunk more in length than width.

                              I acknowledge that it's my shirt and I can do what I want with it, I just know we have a passionate community, so if it makes more sense to sell or trade it to someone who needs the extra length, I can take that under consideration.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jimmer_5
                                Haraki san Student
                                Joined:

                                @neph93:

                                @defnaru:

                                Would like to shrink my UHF a little and was hoping to see what the recommended process was if anyone can help. Thanks.

                                Take it easy. They can shrink meaningfully and too much heat will shrink them a lot and even warp the fabric.

                                I’d start with a 60C machine wash on low spin. Then air dry. Take measurements before and after. Then, if you need more you can introduce the drier on the next round.

                                One more thing, be aware that the material shrinks proportional to the span of fabric so you lose most on the length of the body and the arms. If that is what you want, great, if not you can tug hard along the seams of the shirt while it is drying to mitigate a little of the shrinkage.

                                @neph93 , I chickened out and I’m finally getting around to doing this.  60C is 140F, so that sounds like a truly hot wash.  My machine doesn’t list temperatures, only specific cycles like hot/cold, warm/cold, warm/warm, cold/cold.  Do you remember what you did?  I am trying not to make it all fuzzy, so I’m washing inside out and I’d prefer not to wash it twice for the same reason.

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • neph93N
                                  neph93
                                  見習いボス
                                  Joined:

                                  @jimmer_5:

                                  My machine doesn’t list temperatures, only specific cycles like hot/cold, warm/cold, warm/warm, cold/cold.  Do you remember what you did?

                                  Most European machines (certainly the ones I have) have digital settings so you can choose any temp from 20C-95C. No hot/warm/cold descriptors I’m afraid.

                                  I’d imagine cold is 30C, warm is 40C and hot is 60C but I could be wrong. Maybe check the users manual online?

                                  “Some of those that work forces
                                  Are the same that burn crosses”

                                  • Virginia Woolf
                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    DrPat
                                    Iron Heart Deity
                                    Joined:

                                    How about publishing the amount of shrinkage for each dimension as a result of overdying. That would provide a good reference for the maximum amount of shrinkage you’ll get when washing. It seems that the UHF shrinkage question is still one of the most asked.

                                    last edited by pechelmanP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • pechelmanP
                                      pechelman
                                      啓蒙家
                                      @DrPat
                                      Joined:

                                      @DrPat said in Shrinking a IH UHF:

                                      How about publishing the amount of shrinkage for each dimension as a result of overdying. That would provide a good reference for the maximum amount of shrinkage you’ll get when washing. It seems that the UHF shrinkage question is still one of the most asked.

                                      i compared the sizing charts of the original version versus the OD versions of the recent OD UHF's and was surprised to generally see little shrinkage in the widths and about .5" lost on the lengths. There were a few exceptions, what could be easily attributed to vastly different sample sizes, but it gave me confidence on the "half-size shrinkage" on the original version of the product statement being fairly accurate.

                                      edit: this is far from a complete story, but here's a comparison of the 330's
                                      7199c89c-52c1-4e9a-b105-94b61f763159-image.png

                                      last edited by pechelman 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright Iron Heart 2022.