• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    IH-555S-SLB - 16oz Slubby Selvedge Denim Super Slim Cut Jeans - Indigo

    Bottoms
    35
    125
    17.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jmceachern
      Raw and Unwashed
      Joined:

      @Giles:

      BUT.  Measuring your waist size is a very inaccurate way of measuring what tag-size you will need.  You need to do measure a pair that currently fit you well, the way we articulate on each product page…

      Yes all of my current jeans that fit measure approx 35 so I would be getting the exact size without stretching.

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KasiK
        Kasi
        見習いボス
        Joined:

        No

        You take away away one inches measurement…

        You need 34 inches it will stretch one inches and become 35

        It not rocket science

        The world's insane
        While you drink champagne
        And I'm livin' in black rain 4Q 🖕

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • neph93N
          neph93
          見習いボス
          Joined:

          @jmceachern:

          Yes all of my current jeans that fit measure approx 35 so I would be getting the exact size without stretching.

          Then you'll need a waist that measures around 34" if you want to end up at 35".

          “Some of those that work forces
          Are the same that burn crosses”

          • Virginia Woolf
          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jmceachern
            Raw and Unwashed
            Joined:

            @neph93:

            @jmceachern:

            Yes all of my current jeans that fit measure approx 35 so I would be getting the exact size without stretching.

            Then you'll need a waist that measures around 34" if you want to end up at 35".

            Ok thanks.  Trying to figure out what size/ lot might work for me. First timer.  Leaning towards the 888.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • neph93N
              neph93
              見習いボス
              Joined:

              @jmceachern:

              Ok thanks.  Trying to figure out what size/ lot might work for me. First timer.  Leaning towards the 888.

              Not easy, I remember myself.

              If you have athletic thighs then then the 555 may not work. The taper from thigh to knee is pretty wicked, and the waist/thigh ratio is big (ie. the waist measures big but the thigh measures small).

              If you want a smaller hem then the 777 doable, because it has a bigger knee measurement, so a little more room in the thigh.

              The 888 is a bigger version of the 777 but with a different top block. Comfy relaxed fit but the taper and top block make it sharp still. You'd need a w34 in those.

              The 634 and 666 are straight cuts, mixing tradition with a sharp modern edge. The 666 is slimmer with a trim top block.

              If you haven't already, check here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans

              “Some of those that work forces
              Are the same that burn crosses”

              • Virginia Woolf
              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jmceachern
                Raw and Unwashed
                Joined:

                @neph93:

                @jmceachern:

                Ok thanks.  Trying to figure out what size/ lot might work for me. First timer.  Leaning towards the 888.

                Not easy, I remember myself.

                If you have athletic thighs then then the 555 may not work. The taper from thigh to knee is pretty wicked, and the waist/thigh ratio is big (ie. the waist measures big but the thigh measures small).

                If you want a smaller hem then the 777 doable, because it has a bigger knee measurement, so a little more room in the thigh.

                The 888 is a bigger version of the 777 but with a different top block. Comfy relaxed fit but the taper and top block make it sharp still. You'd need a w34 in those.

                The 634 and 666 are straight cuts, mixing tradition with a sharp modern edge. The 666 is slimmer with a trim top block.

                If you haven't already, check here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans

                Cool. Thanks for all that.

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GilesG
                  Giles
                  IHUK Crew
                  Joined:

                  The boys at shop@ironheart.co.uk will give you loads of help, if required….

                  "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jmceachern
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    Joined:

                    @Giles:

                    The boys at shop@ironheart.co.uk will give you loads of help, if required….

                    Excellent thanks!

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Filthy2123ozjunkieF
                      Filthy2123ozjunkie
                      見習いボスー
                      Joined:

                      @jmceachern maybe send ihuk a message during regular business hours using the chat and see if they can find you a pair with a smaller waist. I use this to chat with them all the time!

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jmceachern
                        Raw and Unwashed
                        Joined:

                        @Filthy:

                        @jmceachern maybe send ihuk a message during regular business hours using the chat and see if they can find you a pair with a smaller waist. I use this to chat with them all the time!

                        Excellent! Thanks. I’ll do that.

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Filthy2123ozjunkieF
                          Filthy2123ozjunkie
                          見習いボスー
                          Joined:

                          🙂

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            Joe_M
                            Joined:

                            @jmceachern:

                            @neph93:

                            @jmceachern:

                            Ok thanks.  Trying to figure out what size/ lot might work for me. First timer.  Leaning towards the 888.

                            Not easy, I remember myself.

                            If you have athletic thighs then then the 555 may not work. The taper from thigh to knee is pretty wicked, and the waist/thigh ratio is big (ie. the waist measures big but the thigh measures small).

                            If you want a smaller hem then the 777 doable, because it has a bigger knee measurement, so a little more room in the thigh.

                            The 888 is a bigger version of the 777 but with a different top block. Comfy relaxed fit but the taper and top block make it sharp still. You'd need a w34 in those.

                            The 634 and 666 are straight cuts, mixing tradition with a sharp modern edge. The 666 is slimmer with a trim top block.

                            If you haven't already, check here: https://www.ironheart.co.uk/content/our-cuts-jeans

                            Cool. Thanks for all that.

                            @jmceachern, in addition to the cut guide that @neph93 linked, I've also found the resource below to be especially helpful for reference from time to time when I forget how one cut is intended to measure up to another.

                            https://gallery.ironheart.co.uk/PHOTOS/Cut-Guides/Cut-Guide/

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jmceachern
                              Raw and Unwashed
                              Joined:

                              Thanks Joe M. That’s helpful. Good to see the different cuts side by side.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                BrianA
                                Haraki san Prodigy
                                Joined:

                                I think I might just be a little bit confused because the front rise, back rise, and thighs are all comparably smaller in the 666s for the slubby denim (in at least the size 36 and 38 where I'm looking) though I keep reading on the forum and IH site that it's the 555 that's suppose to be slimmer cut in the top block. I'd prefer whichever is roomier and that's looking like the 555s (and not the 666s) but that seems wrong because the 555s are said to be the slimmest cut jeans you've got.  Is there something I'm missing or not understanding?

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  Joe_M
                                  Joined:

                                  @jmceachern:

                                  Thanks Joe M. That’s helpful. Good to see the different cuts side by side.

                                  Yeah I had the same thought, @jmceachern, the side-by-side visual comparisons are very useful.

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    Joe_M
                                    Joined:

                                    @BrianA:

                                    I think I might just be a little bit confused because the front rise, back rise, and thighs are all comparably smaller in the 666s for the slubby denim (in at least the size 36 and 38 where I'm looking) though I keep reading on the forum and IH site that it's the 555 that's suppose to be slimmer cut in the top block. I'd prefer whichever is roomier and that's looking like the 555s (and not the 666s) but that seems wrong because the 555s are said to be the slimmest cut jeans you've got.  Is there something I'm missing or not understanding?

                                    @BrianA, I can't compare the 555S-SLB to the 666S-SLB, but my slubby 555s definitely have a more roomie top block than both of my non-slubby 666s.  The taper from the thighs down though is much greater in my 555s.

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • neph93N
                                      neph93
                                      見習いボス
                                      Joined:

                                      @BrianA:

                                      Is there something I'm missing or not understanding?

                                      Top block refers to everything from the crotch seam and up. Everything that isn’t the legs. The top block on the 666 is the trimmest of all IH cuts. The rise is lower, the hip measurements (which IH don’t publish are smaller, and the seat is higher. The top block in the 555 is quite roomy. There is an fairly straight upwards taper
                                      towards the waistband and a low-ish seat.

                                      However the thigh measurements on the 555 and 666 are comparable. The difference is that the 555 takes that starting point and tapers harshly to the knee. Check out the difference between the knee dims in the 555 and 666 to illustrate. After that they both drop fairly straight to the hem.

                                      Hope that helps. Do ask if anything was unclear.

                                      “Some of those that work forces
                                      Are the same that burn crosses”

                                      • Virginia Woolf
                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        BrianA
                                        Haraki san Prodigy
                                        Joined:

                                        Thank you everyone for your help and suggestions!

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          Kingmob31
                                          Raw and Unwashed
                                          Joined:

                                          So, any wear updates? Appreciate it hasn't been long, but looking at these as my next purchase as they'll probably last into early summer.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • GilesG
                                            Giles
                                            IHUK Crew
                                            Joined:

                                            Another wash of my sample IH-666S-SLB.  About 7 or 8 months and approx 6 washes.

                                            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2022.