Watches - another OCD problem
-
Not the first watch to be purpose built for blind people
I bought one years ago when it was on Kickstarter. Interesting watch.
Ah, I've seen that pop up in advertisements but didn't think of the use for blind folks–a tactile solution is nice too, since you don't necessarily irritate those around you when checking the time. Very clever.
-
Prices for hot Rolexes are starting to fall.
https://usa.watchpro.com/prices-hottest-rolex-models-falling-fast-says-secondary-market-specialist/
-
Nice grail! Especially for one who travels internationally as much as you do, that's a great choice.
Oh, and I forgot to complain / express my confusion about how that Hermes has the hemispheres reversed for the moon views. It seems there must be some explanation for that, it's otherwise so close to perfection–why wouldn't north and south be oriented top and bottom?
-
watch on bund strap
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
-
Seiko Arnie
Looks much smaller on Arnold’s wrist…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I think Arnie’s wrist is a little bit thicker than yours!
-
nice watches G. time to finish the trifecta with the coke…
-
-
I love unbranded fliegers.
Y'all see the new Grand Seiko "thin" dress watches with manual winding and a screw-down crown? Odd ducks. At least they oriented the power reserves correctly, though the layout seems cluttered. I understand that they were probably going for symmetry between the small seconds and power reserve complications with the horizontal alignment, but I think the small seconds perhaps would be better situated at 6 o'clock. And the price points are confusing.
Really love the brand. They helped themselves by getting rid of the superfluous "Seiko/Grand Seiko" branding, but I personally think they need to do the following:
-
Design power reserve indicators into an intuitive orientation.
-
Move power reserve indicators to the back of the movement on transparent-cased watches. Especially when there's an automatic 3-day+ power reserve, this is unnecessary clutter on the dial.
-
Movements and cases should be thinner. Calling a depth of 11.6mm on a manual watch "thin" is embarrassing. Given their technical know-how and vertical integration, it's surprising that they don't produce extremely thin dress watches to rival the Swiss.
-
Quit going to the trouble of exhibition case backs if they're going to then obscure the movement with lion graphics.
-
I hear a lot of complain about their bracelets. While I don't have an issue with them, perhaps given the volume of complaints they should look into it. I do like their oyster-like bracelet and think that it should be used more often (it's almost always the Speedy-like variant).
-
I know that they claim their titanium bracelets do better with pins, but I think they should figure out how to have screws for adjustment links unless they want to knock a few hundred dollars off the asking price.
-
-
Those GS are lovely but I think the pricing is out of wack. I also find the gold GS in the otherwise all-blue-and-silver steel model a bit jarring.
What I find interesting is that they have spent a lot of time building the brand on the basis of highly facetted & polished cases and here they have a rounded, frosted finish..
