Unpopular opinions
-
I dig the loaves of bread
-
@der:
(And are those cutoffs my old friend Desert Camo?)
Absolutely! 3 color desert. I wish I could find some authentic (Surplus, not repro) "chocolate chips", a la Desert Storm/Desert Shield, but those are difficult to come across nowadays.
I dig the loaves of bread
And now, I can't "unsee" my shoes looking like freshly baked bread, lol
-
Q. Do these jeans make me look fat?
A. No darling, it's the pies and cakes that do that.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Agreed. The opposite is also true. A small person wearing clothes that are too big for them just emphasizes their small stature.
-
Agreed. The opposite is also true. A small person wearing clothes that are too big for them just emphasizes their small stature.
I'm more open to clothes not fitting someone when it comes to casual wear like denim. However, I do find frumpy suits and poorly shined dress shoes objectionable.
-
Agreed. Some items, like denim, have a range of 'proper' fits. I was more alluding to suits, jackets, etc. Basically the opposite of fat guy in a little coat.
-
I'd say this is the worst for me. Nothing is more obviously ill-fitting than the near button pop.
-
I have a co-worker who does this. It makes me uncomfortable, more out of imagining the constriction he must feel than out of disgust for the unflattering look.
-
It is 2018. Physical possessions do not have a gender…not a bike, not a car, not a boat, not anything you own. Unless it has chromosomes or genitalia or another form of reproductive system, it remains an 'It's.
God damn sausage fingers and mobile phones. Typos galour now rectified.
-
It is 2018. Physical possession do not have a gender…not a bike, not a car, not a boat, not anything you own. Unless it has chromosomes or genitalia or another for a special reproductive system, it remains an 'It's.
^^That's what it said
-
@der:
It is 2018. Physical possession do not have a gender…not a bike, not a car, not a boat, not anything you own. Unless it has chromosomes or genitalia or another for a special reproductive system, it remains an 'It's.
^^That's what it said
Hahaha. Hate to break it to you but naval vessels always have a sex. SHE.
No breaking news there, I am merely pointing out the absurdity of the practice. Still, if men will choose to be holed up together on a ship for months at a time, if they want to try a convince themselves that their sexuality might not be compromised, then let the vessel be a she…until women are permitted to all areas of the military...
-
Well consider the Romantic languages, in which all nouns carry gender and verbs must be conjugated to agree with them. Perhaps that's why it seems so odd to English speakers to assign gender to inanimate objects.
-
Well consider the Romantic languages, in which all nouns carry gender and verbs must be conjugated to agree with them. Perhaps that's why it seems so odd to English speakers to assign gender to inanimate objects.
Especially in French where 'breasts' are masculine and 'penis' is feminine.
Go figure.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
