Random questions to which you seek an answer

[Megatron1505]

My bet would still be the 634S.

[Chris]

Same.

Sales have been cannibalized somewhat by other models, but it's still a huge seller.  If I remember correctly, Giles once said it outsold the next most popular item by a factor of 2:1.

[Giles]

I'll need to run some numbers.  I am on a plane tonight, I'll try and do it then…

[Appfaff]

@Giles - no rush, and hate to make anyone do anything extra just to find out. Just wondered how the trend was moving or staying the same.

Have a safe flight!

[Giles]

On plane and only have data going back to Oct.

Of total major jeans family sales.

Bear in mind we have been out of 888's, so the data is not as accurate as it could be….

777 - 30%
634 - 26%
666 - 20%
888 - 12%
555 - 11%

[Dion]

That's very interesting as I thought the 555 would be a tad more popular.

[Giles]

Here's the rub.  The 634 and the 666 are generally always available in Japan for us to pull in when we need them.  The other cuts are not available continually, so there are periods when we just can't satisfy demand, so the results are skewed towards the "generally available" cuts.

I have agreed with H, that we will stock the 21oz indigo versions of the 777, 555 and 888 on a constant basis in Kojima, so that should help us to be out of stock less….

[Appfaff]

Very interesting!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Matty123]

Love that 777.

[manufc10]

When I can get the thighs and rise right I love the 777 as well.  555 is probably my least favorite IH cut…I just don't get it lol.

[Matty123]

@manufc10:

When I can get the thighs and rise right I love the 777 as well.  555 is probably my least favorite IH cut…I just don't get it lol.

You just ain’t a Snake bro!! Lol

[Dion]

If sized correctly the 555 is amazing with a great taper and enough room in the top block so the gentleman balloons can breathe.

[neph93]

^ and if you size down you can pretend you were in Motley Crüe ca. 1986 which is fun too (allegedly [emoji849])

[Matty123]

@neph93 you paint quite a picture bro. It’s quite vivid. Haha what a story teller

[Appfaff]

@neph93:

^ and if you size down you can pretend you were in Motley Crüe ca. 1986 which is fun too (allegedly [emoji849])

What was 1986 like?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mustafa911]

No surprise 777 does well. I am little surprise 634 is in second place . I can’t wear 634 has such big hem/opening

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[neph93]

@Appfaff:

@neph93:

^ and if you size down you can pretend you were in Motley Crüe ca. 1986 which is fun too (allegedly [emoji849])

What was 1986 like?

Hard on the genitals.

[manufc10]

Ha! 

funny on several different levels

[manufc10]

@Dion:

If sized correctly the 555 is amazing with a great taper and enough room in the top block so the gentleman balloons can breathe.

It's the large waist-to-thigh/knee ratio that is a bit odd to me.  For me they fit quite large in the waist but the thighs and knees I can barely squeeze in to.  I will say that the very small knee measurements on this cut make for fantastic honeycombs.  I don't entirely dislike the cut it's just probably the oddest cut for my body type.

[neph93]

The 555 is actually pretty good for me with the exception of the knee. That’s what takes them from a snug fit to a tight fit if I’m not careful with sizing (I have three pairs and one of them is 80’s rocker, one is good and one is marginal but doable).